- Jurisdiction
- California
Greetings!
I would like to ask for some legal expert advice on their experience with employer wage and hour scenarios regarding commissions and quota expectations within our corporation.
Since the start of the year, we have been forced to sign or not get paid on 4 renditions of the commission structure. Additionally, our quota is now not definitive and is set to change to get higher each month.
Our company brought in the organization the McKinsey Group to assist in our payment structure, and ever since, we have lost thousands per month while having to achieve higher quotas that consistently go higher monthly while designing the commissions to pay less and less each month should that representative achieve the exact same results each time.
***The Commission structure also requires that a partner who has been assigned to our team, to close a specified amount each month for us to be able to achieve the final 15% and hit 100% of quota. In turn, we are now forced to rely on another's actions for us to achieve quota, otherwise we are liable for not hitting that assigned quota which leads to write ups and PIP's.
Can anyone verify that this method of consistent quota re-arranging and commission redesigning that's framed to pay less to the employee yet require more is applicable?
Many thanks for your help!
I would like to ask for some legal expert advice on their experience with employer wage and hour scenarios regarding commissions and quota expectations within our corporation.
Since the start of the year, we have been forced to sign or not get paid on 4 renditions of the commission structure. Additionally, our quota is now not definitive and is set to change to get higher each month.
Our company brought in the organization the McKinsey Group to assist in our payment structure, and ever since, we have lost thousands per month while having to achieve higher quotas that consistently go higher monthly while designing the commissions to pay less and less each month should that representative achieve the exact same results each time.
***The Commission structure also requires that a partner who has been assigned to our team, to close a specified amount each month for us to be able to achieve the final 15% and hit 100% of quota. In turn, we are now forced to rely on another's actions for us to achieve quota, otherwise we are liable for not hitting that assigned quota which leads to write ups and PIP's.
Can anyone verify that this method of consistent quota re-arranging and commission redesigning that's framed to pay less to the employee yet require more is applicable?
Many thanks for your help!