To court, or not to court...that is the question!

[chuy716]

Long story long...Married in Idaho, now separated and wife moves to Arizona. I kept the old truck, she drove off in the new Subaru packed with her stuff. That was six months ago. She has not made a payment since and consequently, the bank is going to repossess the car...of course, it is BOTH of our names. She just received the divorce papers that suggested she take responsibility for the car as she is in possession of it. She is not going to sign them because she is adament that we come to an "agreement." Here's how I see it: She has the car, she is responsible. Am I right? I am looking for some advice or feedback. We have been in agreement on everything until this...it happened today.

 

[army judge]

You are both responsible for the car.
The "repo" man wants the car, no doubt.
You can mitigate your losses and get the car repossessed by telling the bank where she is, as she apparently isn't going to pay.
Shge wants YOU to pay for her car.
And, if I were you, I wouldn't pay for the car she's using.
Your credit has taken a hit because of her anger.
So, unless you want to pay for her to drive the car, tell the bank where she is.
They'll send the "repo" man to get their car.
You can just play dumb, if she asks you how they found out.
End of this chapter, you can move on to the next, getting your divorce!!!