Hello,
I recently concluded dealing with a seller via eBay. The seller sold me a collector's item that did not have its title document (something it should have had). It turns out that the item in question is still in arrears and money is owed to the original maker... that is why the certificate of authenticity was never released. According to the maker, the seller owes them the money and should he pay his debt they will release the certificate. He has no plans on doing that - he doesn't even feel the debt is his, but instead his ex-wife's despite that he is listed as the Sold To party.
So, at any rate, I left him a negative feedback on eBay stating the item was misrepresented and a lien exists on it and other buyers should beware. He replied and stated I was a "high maintenance buyer" and "made assumptions." I replied in turn and stated the seller lied by omission and sold the item to escape his debt to the original maker.
Now, he is threatening that I slandered him and put a bad mark on his business on eBay. Considering how he does business, the bad mark is well deserved! But regardless... does he have a leg to stand on? All my feedback was truthful according to what I have received from the original maker AND this guy's original invoice marking him as the Sold To and Ship To party.
I find it rather humorous that someone like this would screw me over and then have the nerve to say I slandered him. What about him selling an item without its title? I guess it's fine to screw me over but the minute I give a little back to him.....
I recently concluded dealing with a seller via eBay. The seller sold me a collector's item that did not have its title document (something it should have had). It turns out that the item in question is still in arrears and money is owed to the original maker... that is why the certificate of authenticity was never released. According to the maker, the seller owes them the money and should he pay his debt they will release the certificate. He has no plans on doing that - he doesn't even feel the debt is his, but instead his ex-wife's despite that he is listed as the Sold To party.
So, at any rate, I left him a negative feedback on eBay stating the item was misrepresented and a lien exists on it and other buyers should beware. He replied and stated I was a "high maintenance buyer" and "made assumptions." I replied in turn and stated the seller lied by omission and sold the item to escape his debt to the original maker.
Now, he is threatening that I slandered him and put a bad mark on his business on eBay. Considering how he does business, the bad mark is well deserved! But regardless... does he have a leg to stand on? All my feedback was truthful according to what I have received from the original maker AND this guy's original invoice marking him as the Sold To and Ship To party.
I find it rather humorous that someone like this would screw me over and then have the nerve to say I slandered him. What about him selling an item without its title? I guess it's fine to screw me over but the minute I give a little back to him.....