THEJKH1999
New Member
my ex and I have court orders from HI giving her custody and the ability to move, giving me visitation and a mutual protection order with the outlines of our visitation and contact for child.
She moved to WA and immediatly refused to send my son for my visitation. I filed for a motion to enforce in HI and sent her the subpeona by mail. She filed for a TRO in WA based on my subpeona claiming emotional distress and my threat to take the child out of the state.
The WA hearing was the day before the HI hearing. The commisioner aknowledged that there are allready current orders from HI, I had never violated those orders, there was no threat since I was in HI and they were in WA so no emergency jurisdiction, my EX had only lived in WA for <2 months at the time of the hearing and that there was a hearing the very next day in HI. she ordered a Restraining order for 1 year taking away all my rights of visitation with my son.
In the WA order they said two things interesting, #8 said " WA is the home state" and item #15 said "Hawaii has continuing jurisdiction"!! this is on the same page!! I contacted the FBI and they agreed that it is a direct violation of the UCCJEA but it isnt something they will investigate.
Im interested in making sure this doesnt happen to another innocent father, who is the authority to investigate this against WA or even just the county in WA that did this?
Thank you, THEJKH
I have a scan of the 2 items i listed on my WA court order but cant post pics yet
if someone wants I can PM the scan.
She moved to WA and immediatly refused to send my son for my visitation. I filed for a motion to enforce in HI and sent her the subpeona by mail. She filed for a TRO in WA based on my subpeona claiming emotional distress and my threat to take the child out of the state.
The WA hearing was the day before the HI hearing. The commisioner aknowledged that there are allready current orders from HI, I had never violated those orders, there was no threat since I was in HI and they were in WA so no emergency jurisdiction, my EX had only lived in WA for <2 months at the time of the hearing and that there was a hearing the very next day in HI. she ordered a Restraining order for 1 year taking away all my rights of visitation with my son.
In the WA order they said two things interesting, #8 said " WA is the home state" and item #15 said "Hawaii has continuing jurisdiction"!! this is on the same page!! I contacted the FBI and they agreed that it is a direct violation of the UCCJEA but it isnt something they will investigate.
Im interested in making sure this doesnt happen to another innocent father, who is the authority to investigate this against WA or even just the county in WA that did this?
Thank you, THEJKH
I have a scan of the 2 items i listed on my WA court order but cant post pics yet
