The Court is respectfully denying the relief sought as a matter of law

So...you're the moving party. Are you the/a plaintiff or the defendant? Are you represented by an attorney? Given where you posted this, I assume it's a defamation lawsuit. Correct? Is the lawsuit in federal court or state court? How about a BRIEF explanation of relevant facts?

I assume that "[t]he Court is . . . denying the relief sought" requires no explanation. The second quoted sentence means that the court wants someone to put together a formal order for the court to sign and for the parties to agree on the content of the order. Typically, the party who prevailed would draft the order.

 

What ever you requested in your motion was denied as a matter of law, which could mean that your motion was not entitled to the relief sought under the law.

 

yes, unless the other party files a summary judgment motion and prevails.

 

That means that what you stated as grounds for summary judgment on its face doesn't meet the requirements for summary judgment in your favor. In short you didn't provide what is needed for the court to conclude you should win based just on the motion — a trial or hearing is needed to resolve on or more issues in the case.

The court is asking the parties to confer on the exact language of the order to be issued by the court and submit your agreed order through the court's system. It's a way to get the parties to do some of the work the courts used to but no longer have the time to do given the increase in litigation and the fact that the state hasn't provided sufficient resources for more judges and courts to handle it.

 

I doubt that anybody can answer that question without you providing details about the case.

Are you plaintiff or defendant?
How much money is this about?
Small claims court or regular court?
Do you and/or the other party have lawyers?
Who is suing who and why?
What made you think you had grounds for a motion for summary judgment?

Did you ever read Florida Rule 1.510 - Summary Judgment?

Rule 1.510 - SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510 | Casetext Search + Citator

 

Then you need to "confer" with them as to drafting the order that the judge requested.

Now that you lost on summary judgment it seems clear that you will have to proceed to trial and prove your allegations.

No. I am not a lawyer. You'll have to rely on your own devices. Sorry.

 

It appears you got the horse before the cart. The court is never going to rule on damages until liability is proven.

 

None of that is libel.

 

Please answer the questions I asked in my prior response.

Subject to your responses, the non-moving party apparently prevailed.

None of us know anything about your case beyond what you've told us.

No conceivable way for anyone here to know.