markmiller
New Member
I am a defendant in a suit, In defending my suit I need to be able to prove that a phone number in my phone records (which I will provide as evidence) is in fact the plaintiffs. Upon presenting the phone records and proof that the phone number is in fact the plaintiffs I will win the case, no doubt.
There are two numbers that are the plaintiffs, one the plaintiff listed as the contact number on the summons, so obviously I don't have to prove that one, However the phone number that is not listed on the court documents (that I must get proof of) is the most important calls that were made.
I am pretty much assuming if I don't have proof, and when I give the phone records as evidence the plaintiff will just deny the phone number is theirs. That would be one one less thing supporting my case.
Getting to my question. In my state, it is a two party consent state as far as recording phone conversations, so I cant have someone call and record the conversation to prove that it is the plaintiffs number. However would it be legal to call, and record the voicemail message? because it obviously says the plaintiffs name and would be proof there. And it wouldn't actually be recording a phone conversation.
Also, I read somewhere also that if the call is placed from federal land, or an Indian reservation, then it falls under federal ruling, which is a one party consent law and then the conversation can be recorded. Has anyone heard of this working, and standing up in court?
any more suggestions?
I am considering ordering the reverse cell phone lookup which will cost me a little money, but not quite sure but there is a possibility that the number may be in his girlfriends name. so if thats the case, he could deni knowing the girlfriend, and deni knowing anything about the phone number.
what is comes down to is this is a frivolous case, and the plaintiff is trying to get some free money, plain and simple.
There are two numbers that are the plaintiffs, one the plaintiff listed as the contact number on the summons, so obviously I don't have to prove that one, However the phone number that is not listed on the court documents (that I must get proof of) is the most important calls that were made.
I am pretty much assuming if I don't have proof, and when I give the phone records as evidence the plaintiff will just deny the phone number is theirs. That would be one one less thing supporting my case.
Getting to my question. In my state, it is a two party consent state as far as recording phone conversations, so I cant have someone call and record the conversation to prove that it is the plaintiffs number. However would it be legal to call, and record the voicemail message? because it obviously says the plaintiffs name and would be proof there. And it wouldn't actually be recording a phone conversation.
Also, I read somewhere also that if the call is placed from federal land, or an Indian reservation, then it falls under federal ruling, which is a one party consent law and then the conversation can be recorded. Has anyone heard of this working, and standing up in court?
any more suggestions?
I am considering ordering the reverse cell phone lookup which will cost me a little money, but not quite sure but there is a possibility that the number may be in his girlfriends name. so if thats the case, he could deni knowing the girlfriend, and deni knowing anything about the phone number.
what is comes down to is this is a frivolous case, and the plaintiff is trying to get some free money, plain and simple.