Millions of salaried workers will soon be eligible for overtime pay in the US

army judge

Super Moderator
Jurisdiction
US Federal Law
The news marks a significant jump from the current overtime eligibility threshold of $35,568, which was set under the Trump administration in 2019.


NEW YORK — The Biden administration has finalized a new rule set to make millions of more salaried workers eligible for overtime pay in the U.S.

The move marks the largest expansion in federal overtime eligibility seen in decades. Starting July 1, employers will be required pay overtime to salaried workers who make less than $43,888 a year in certain executive, administrative and professional roles, the Labor Department said Tuesday. That cap will then rise to $58,656 by the start of 2025.

"Too often, lower-paid salaried workers are doing the same job as their hourly counterparts but are spending more time away from their families for no additional pay. That is unacceptable," acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su said in a prepared statement.
She added that the administration was "following through on our promise to raise the bar."
Tuesday's news marks a significant jump from the current overtime eligibility threshold of $35,568, which was set under the Trump administration in 2019 — just three years after a more generous Obama-era effort was ultimately scuttled in court after facing pushback from some business leaders and Republican politicians.
Under the federal law, nearly all hourly workers in the U.S. are entitled to overtime pay after 40 hours a week. But many salaried workers are exempt from that requirement — unless they earn below a certain level.
The new rule also expands overtime eligibility for some highly-compensated workers. According to a Labor Department FAQ, the current $107,432 annual threshold for highly-compensated workers is set to increase to $132,964 on July 1 and $151,164 by the start of 2025.
The Labor Department estimates that 4 million lower-paid salary workers who are exempt under current regulations will become eligible for overtime protections in the first year under the new rule. An additional 292,900 higher-compensated workers are also expected to get overtime entitlements.
The July 1 increases update the current salary thresholds using methodology put in place under the Trump administration's 2019 regulation. The new rule's methodology takes effect Jan. 1, the Labor Department said, with salary thresholds set to update every three years based on the latest wage data.
The Biden administration first announced plans for its new rule in late August, and submitted a proposal in September. The Labor Department said it "conducted extensive engagement with employers, workers, unions and other stakeholders" and considered more than 33,000 comments as it developed the final rule.

Critics have argued that the new regulation could saddle companies with new costs and add to persistent labor challenges. In a statement, U.S. Rep. Virginia Foxx, a North Carolina Republican and chair of the House Education and the Workforce Committee, said that employers "are staring down the barrel of billions in annual costs to comply with the rule" while calling the regulation "excessive and heavy-handed."
Meanwhile, advocates applauded the administration's rule — with some noting that such a move is overdue. The left-leaning Economic Policy Institute says that the overtime threshold has not been updated properly for almost 50 years — leaving millions without such federal protections.
"The rule is an important step toward correctly valuing one of the most precious resources workers have — their time," EPI president Heidi Shierholz said Tuesday. "This rule is an essential milestone in creating a stronger, fairer economy."

 
Sure, millions of people will make more money with overtime but they will only end up spending it on the inevitable rise in the cost of goods and services to cover it.

So much for controlling inflation.

Sigh.
 
The rule is a logical one, putting lower level adminstrative staffers on par with rank and file employees for OT. Both groups have little control over their work schedules (unless they are in a union with collective bargaining agreement with the employer) and neither group is making big, significant decisions for the company and neither group gets paid the often large (sometimes astronomically large) pay packages that senior exectives. But while I think it's a logical and fair rule, I lament that it likely will add to inflation, as Jack rightly points out.
 
Sure, millions of people will make more money with overtime but they will only end up spending it on the inevitable rise in the cost of goods and services to cover it.

So much for controlling inflation.

Sigh.

Bringing down inflation is a prudent task to be sure.

However, what appears to be one thing is very often another.

This is a presidential election year.

The overtime ploy is about a certain individual and others of his persuasion in obtaining more votes than the other dudes/dudettes.
 
Of course politics are involved. Every politician from the President on down puts out policies they hope will help them get reelcted or move up to a higher office. I'm not saying that as a criticism. That's what voters expect in a democratic republic: that the person elected is going to do things they want. Trump did it, Biden does it, and whichever one wins their second term will keep doing it. It's how the system has always worked, for both good and bad. I don't have a particular problem with that, so long as the people we elect are a good pick for the job. In this upcoming presidential election, IMO, we don't have sterling choices this time around, and a good part of that for each candidate has a lot to do with things other than the policies they say they'll pursue.
 
Back
Top