Tiffany_Cassara
New Member
Is denial of due process rights manifest constitutional error or just manifest error?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am trying to write a brief for writ of certiorari, writ of mandamus and writ of habeas corpus to the 2nd DCA Florida. I got the phrase manifest constitutional error from Black's Law 9th. I am trying to assert to proper error and differentiate within the brief between manifest, manifest constitutional, plain, clear, clerical and harmless error. There are numerous errors that span over 5 hearings. My appellate counsel withdrew and I can not afford another attorney. My due process rights were denied in matters involving my children. I had ineffective court appointed counsel, he was appointed 2 weeks before the hearing on a three year old case. Motion for continuance was denied twice. He failed to properly cross, he did not review the file, he kept asking the court to take judicial notice of the court file instead of doing his homework. He didn't present evidence that I personally gave him and kept telling me not to ask him questions. He didn't object to hearsay, and I could go on and on. The entire process was a three ring circus. The Court applied powers of disposition to a post disposition motion that had already been heard twice and decided twice. A third party was allowed to examine and cross to my objection and they were not a party in the case. The order was a five page written order with finding of facts and conclusions of law that are no longer controlling. I did not receive a fair hearing with absent outside influence. It is a very lengthy and complex case. I am already 46 pages into the brief. I just want it to sound right. It was a simple question. I am fighting for my kids. This has to be perfect.I don't know where you are getting your phrases but denial of Due Process is a State and Federal Constitutional Violation as well as a Statutory violation of rights. Why?