danoleander
New Member
Hello,
Recently went through about a 3 month review process to claim retro-pay for being 'on-call'. Employer started paying employees that were available after hours a daily "on-call" rate sometime early in 2009. Seems that many employees were not notified including myself. I didn't start claiming this until beginning of 2010 and recently thought I'd request retro-pay.
The company has denied the request, even after offering up emails responding to after hour issues. They state I have no official documentation that I was "on-call", even though I was the only employee in the area to service the companies contractual SLA with regional customers. I have tried to explain to them that it was clearly implied and therefore no documentation exists other than emails responding to issues after hours.
The amount is 1 hour per day of of being "on-call" which would be most of the year.
Is this worth filing a suit? If so, do I stand to jeopardize my job?
Appreciate any help or feedback
Recently went through about a 3 month review process to claim retro-pay for being 'on-call'. Employer started paying employees that were available after hours a daily "on-call" rate sometime early in 2009. Seems that many employees were not notified including myself. I didn't start claiming this until beginning of 2010 and recently thought I'd request retro-pay.
The company has denied the request, even after offering up emails responding to after hour issues. They state I have no official documentation that I was "on-call", even though I was the only employee in the area to service the companies contractual SLA with regional customers. I have tried to explain to them that it was clearly implied and therefore no documentation exists other than emails responding to issues after hours.
The amount is 1 hour per day of of being "on-call" which would be most of the year.
Is this worth filing a suit? If so, do I stand to jeopardize my job?
Appreciate any help or feedback