Richie Snare
New Member
- Jurisdiction
- Nebraska
This has multiple parts, I think.
First: Almost every single article I read claims businesses can mandate vaccines. However:
"Federal law 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) requires that the person to whom an EUA vaccine is administered be advised, 'of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.'
"This right of refusal stems from the fact that EUA products are, by definition, experimental and forced participation in a medical experiment could result in injury. Under the Nuremberg Code, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is 'absolutely essential.'"
The Covid jab is experimental, because it is issued under an EUA. It is not licensed by the FDA, meaning they do not know the long-term side effects.
Dr. Amanda Cohn, the executive secretary of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, was asked if Covid-19 vaccination can be required, she responded that under an EUA, "vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory"...Cohn later affirmed that this prohibition on requiring the vaccines applies to organizations, including hospitals.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/min-archive/min-2020-08-508.pdf
https://www.fda.gov/media/143982/download
Next: many state HIPPA doesn't apply to businesses. However, to release medical information requires you to provide a written release of information. Requiring a person to provide "proof of vaccination" seems a lot like side-stepping the issue, by requiring people to give up their information, to do business. Businesses aren't allowed to inquire about as to if you have HIV/AIDS, STDS, TB, or others, are they.
Now, before anyone tries to say something like "...in the interest of public safety," or "medical emergency," I present to you the facts that there's no epidemic, let alone, a pandemic:
Currently, we are at a 98% recovery rate; World O Meter! Since this has started, the science has remained at the range of 95 - 99% recovery rate! You can also see it in chart format; Statisa. That tiny bar? The [at time of posting] roughly global deaths of 3.9M, out of a global population of 7.8B? Also, see the huge bar, almost on par with cases? That's our recoveries. There's no saying that it's not real, nor that it kills. However, with a current recovery rate of 98%, and it has been like this the entire time, what is the legal grounds to mandate masks, or force vaccines, when the evidence clearly shows there is no crisis? Forcing either, or anything, for something that clearly isn't a problem, should then be considered in violation of religious rights [to refuse vaccines], and general constitutional rights.
First: Almost every single article I read claims businesses can mandate vaccines. However:
"Federal law 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) requires that the person to whom an EUA vaccine is administered be advised, 'of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.'
"This right of refusal stems from the fact that EUA products are, by definition, experimental and forced participation in a medical experiment could result in injury. Under the Nuremberg Code, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is 'absolutely essential.'"
The Covid jab is experimental, because it is issued under an EUA. It is not licensed by the FDA, meaning they do not know the long-term side effects.
Dr. Amanda Cohn, the executive secretary of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, was asked if Covid-19 vaccination can be required, she responded that under an EUA, "vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory"...Cohn later affirmed that this prohibition on requiring the vaccines applies to organizations, including hospitals.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/min-archive/min-2020-08-508.pdf
https://www.fda.gov/media/143982/download
Next: many state HIPPA doesn't apply to businesses. However, to release medical information requires you to provide a written release of information. Requiring a person to provide "proof of vaccination" seems a lot like side-stepping the issue, by requiring people to give up their information, to do business. Businesses aren't allowed to inquire about as to if you have HIV/AIDS, STDS, TB, or others, are they.
Now, before anyone tries to say something like "...in the interest of public safety," or "medical emergency," I present to you the facts that there's no epidemic, let alone, a pandemic:
Currently, we are at a 98% recovery rate; World O Meter! Since this has started, the science has remained at the range of 95 - 99% recovery rate! You can also see it in chart format; Statisa. That tiny bar? The [at time of posting] roughly global deaths of 3.9M, out of a global population of 7.8B? Also, see the huge bar, almost on par with cases? That's our recoveries. There's no saying that it's not real, nor that it kills. However, with a current recovery rate of 98%, and it has been like this the entire time, what is the legal grounds to mandate masks, or force vaccines, when the evidence clearly shows there is no crisis? Forcing either, or anything, for something that clearly isn't a problem, should then be considered in violation of religious rights [to refuse vaccines], and general constitutional rights.
