firehawk2009
New Member
a friend's unfortunate situation is being spirraled even more out of control.
their accuser is their ex partner who has scared the life out of him for something they did not do all because of a bad ending of a relationship which was her fault (in complete honesty) and her friends added fuel to the fire.
he is now being taken to court and the date is approaching fast and he feels that he does not seem to have any defence.
The accuser is now trying to get an ex friend of his to make a statement against him which makes no sense as:
1) they have never met
2) they dont know each other
3) what relevance does the ex friend have to the entire matter? None!
4) his ex friend said she has nothing bad to say about him at all and wouldnt do such a thing (which i dont believe to be honest given her past and what she had put him through) - and have emails to prove this which he believes can be used against her if she goes and gives evidence from a complete stranger!
Can this be used?
this ex friend for whatever reason is telling him.
he has email proofs though that the ex friend said that she would not say anything against him as she knows that he is not such a person that is being made out of him and so on and that she has nothing bad to say about him.
So why on earth is the accuser getting her involved? Furthermore is this allowed even though the ex friend has no relevance to the matter in any way at all?
he had a mention hearing last week which was interesting.
the S41 application was denied to bring up previous history of the accuser. The declining reasons made no sense at all which prompted the barrister to have a mention hearing.
There was no "harrasment" warning found that the accuser said was given to the defendant.
The prosecution also havent got any "experts" to analyse emails that were exchanged between them as the prosecution say that there is no relevance in the matter but also that they werent instructed to do so - they DID give them instructions.
The reason for the email/phone experts is because in her statement, she states the relationship was over a month before, this is absolutely not true and he has proof of this.
The prosecution also have not disclosed anything about this alleged breach of bail a few days before xmas which to me personally means they do not have any proof or evidence but only word of mouth (again).
he just doesnt know what more to do or say. he has no idea how to defend himself and prove that she is lying.
As I may have mentioned earlier on another post, the accuser posted publically on the internet begging for money from people as she was "scared" of losing her home and kids because of unpaid rent. (he bailed her out last time!)
She also makes further allegations which are such lies and so not true, such as hacking into emails and frauding her bank account of a large sum of money.
can this discovery be also put into the case?
The original matter is that she has accused him of assaulting her (common assault and sexual assault) both on a VERY minor scale.
thanks for any help
their accuser is their ex partner who has scared the life out of him for something they did not do all because of a bad ending of a relationship which was her fault (in complete honesty) and her friends added fuel to the fire.
he is now being taken to court and the date is approaching fast and he feels that he does not seem to have any defence.
The accuser is now trying to get an ex friend of his to make a statement against him which makes no sense as:
1) they have never met
2) they dont know each other
3) what relevance does the ex friend have to the entire matter? None!
4) his ex friend said she has nothing bad to say about him at all and wouldnt do such a thing (which i dont believe to be honest given her past and what she had put him through) - and have emails to prove this which he believes can be used against her if she goes and gives evidence from a complete stranger!
Can this be used?
this ex friend for whatever reason is telling him.
he has email proofs though that the ex friend said that she would not say anything against him as she knows that he is not such a person that is being made out of him and so on and that she has nothing bad to say about him.
So why on earth is the accuser getting her involved? Furthermore is this allowed even though the ex friend has no relevance to the matter in any way at all?
he had a mention hearing last week which was interesting.
the S41 application was denied to bring up previous history of the accuser. The declining reasons made no sense at all which prompted the barrister to have a mention hearing.
There was no "harrasment" warning found that the accuser said was given to the defendant.
The prosecution also havent got any "experts" to analyse emails that were exchanged between them as the prosecution say that there is no relevance in the matter but also that they werent instructed to do so - they DID give them instructions.
The reason for the email/phone experts is because in her statement, she states the relationship was over a month before, this is absolutely not true and he has proof of this.
The prosecution also have not disclosed anything about this alleged breach of bail a few days before xmas which to me personally means they do not have any proof or evidence but only word of mouth (again).
he just doesnt know what more to do or say. he has no idea how to defend himself and prove that she is lying.
As I may have mentioned earlier on another post, the accuser posted publically on the internet begging for money from people as she was "scared" of losing her home and kids because of unpaid rent. (he bailed her out last time!)
She also makes further allegations which are such lies and so not true, such as hacking into emails and frauding her bank account of a large sum of money.
can this discovery be also put into the case?
The original matter is that she has accused him of assaulting her (common assault and sexual assault) both on a VERY minor scale.
thanks for any help
