Texas Law Enforcement Granted Authority to Arrest Border Invaders

army judge

Super Moderator
Jurisdiction
Texas
Author's Note: If this law stands and is an effective deterrent to the hordes of those humans who invade our country's sovereignty and disregard her laws with impunity; it just might put an end to these transgressors.

===============

BROWNSVILLE, Texas (AP) — Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott on Monday approved sweeping new powers that allow police to arrest migrants who illegally cross the U.S. border and give local judges authority to order them to leave the country, testing the limits of how far a state can go to enforce immigration laws.

Opponents have called the measure the most dramatic attempt by a state to police immigration since a 2010 Arizona law — denounced by critics as the "Show Me Your Papers" bill — that was largely struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court. Immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility, and Texas' law is also likely to face swift legal challenges.

The law, which takes effect in March, allows any Texas law enforcement officer to arrest people who are suspected of entering the country illegally. Once in custody, they could either agree to a Texas judge's order to leave the U.S. or be prosecuted on misdemeanor charges of illegal entry. Migrants who don't leave could face arrest again under more serious felony charges.

Abbott, who signed the law in front of a section of border fence in Brownsville, predicted the number of people crossing illegally into Texas would drop by "well over 50%, maybe 75%." He did not offer evidence for that estimate.


"The consequences of it are so extreme that the people being smuggled by the cartels, they will not want to be coming into the state of Texas," he said.

The law adds another tension point over immigration amid a struggle between the White House and Senate negotiators to reach a deal on border security. Republicans in Congress are demanding changes to the immigration system in exchange for any help for Ukraine, Israel and other national security needs.

Texas Republicans have increasingly challenged the U.S. government's authority over immigration, saying President Joe Biden's administration isn't doing enough to control the 1,950-mile (3,149-kilometer) southern border. Texas has bused more than 65,000 migrants to cities across America since August 2022 and recently installed razor wire along the banks of the Rio Grande, which has snagged and injured some asylum-seekers.

The U.S. government on Monday temporarily shut down two railroad border crossings in Texas, a move that rail operators said would hamper trade ahead of Christmas. Troy Miller, U.S. Customs and Border Protection's acting commissioner, said the closures at Eagle Pass and El Paso were a response to more migrants traveling on freight trains, particularly over the last week.

Miller said authorities are seeing "unprecedented" arrivals at the border, topping 10,000 crossings on some days this month.

Shortly after Abbott signed the new law, the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas said it would challenge the measure in court. More than 20 congressional Democrats also signed a letter urging the U.S. Justice Department to sue to stop the law, known as Senate Bill 4.

"SB 4 is dangerous for the people of Texas and interferes with the federal government's exclusive authority over immigration and foreign affairs," the letter read.

Mexico's government also has rebuked the measure. Under bilateral and international agreements, Mexico is required to accept deportations of its own citizens, but not those of other countries. Under the Texas law, migrants ordered to leave would be sent to ports of entry along the border with Mexico, even if they are not Mexican citizens. In September and October, Venezuelans were the largest nationality arrested for illegally crossing the U.S. border.

During debate in the Texas House in November, GOP state Rep. David Spiller pushed back against concerns that the law would be used as a dragnet to arrest immigrants statewide. He said enforcement would mostly take place in border counties. But he also rebuffed several efforts by Democrats to narrow the law, including a proposed carve-out for police on college campuses.

Because the illegal entry charge is a misdemeanor, which has a statue of limitation of two years, Spiller has said the law will not be used to target immigrants who have long been settled in the U.S.

"This is not, 'Round up everyone who is here illegally and ship them back to Mexico,'" he said during debate over the bill.

Opponents have accused Texas Republicans of using the law as a vehicle to force the Supreme Court's new conservative majority to revisit its landmark 2012 Arizona decision. At the time, Justice Anthony Kennedy said Arizona may have "understandable frustrations" with immigrants who are in the country illegally but that it can't pursue policies that "undermine federal law."

Texas governor signs bill that lets police arrest migrants who enter the US illegally



Texas governor signs bill that lets police arrest migrants who enter the US illegally




Gov. Greg Abbott signs bill making illegal immigration a state crime
 
and cue the democrats calling everyone racist and this is the federal governments job. It would be a different story if the blue states had to care for and give them everything. When democrats are in power and the borders are open they gain new voters daily so they have an incentive to not fix it and ignore the issue.
 
The federal government has too many jobs, needs to be less government. Anytime the government gets involved in anything costs rise, complexity rises, and the people are worse off for it.
Your answer is non-responsive. Please note that the question is not asking your opinion on whether or not it should be the federal government's job. Are you suggesting that this is not the federal government's job?
 
Your answer is non-responsive. Please note that the question is not asking your opinion on whether or not it should be the federal government's job. Are you suggesting that this is not the federal government's job?

I am suggesting you are a troll and on my ignore list, which you will remain. Carry on.
 
Are you suggesting that this is not the federal government's job?

Of course it's the federal government's job.

The federal government is not doing it and states are suffering.

TBH I doubt that the Texas law will be upheld by the Supreme Court, using the AZ case decision as precedent.

If more states passed laws like this one, maybe something will stick.
 
....and this is the federal governments job.

The Constitution gives the federal government the exclusive power to make foreign policy and decide immigration policy. The federal courts have so far been consistent in that interpretation of the Constitution. On this point I don't see the current Supreme Court tossing out decades of precedent. The conservatives on the Court are not looking to hobble the federal government. You don't have to like that its the job of the feds to do it, but until the Supreme Court changes its precedent that is the current state of the law. If you want to change it to give the states control over immigration feel free to lobby your state's Congressional representatives to start the process to amend the Constitution to make the law more to your liking. My bet is that a proposed amendment to do that would not clear Congress, much less get the approval of 75% of the states to ratify it.

I've said it on these boards before: immigration reform is long overdue and both parties have known that since before this century began. But neither seems willing to work with the other to reach a solution that both can support. There are lot of options between the two extremes on immigration that get the most notice on the internet. One or more of those approaches might achieve real results in stemming the tide of illegal migrants and adjusting our immigration laws to make it easier to attract talented and educated foreign persons to come and live and work in the U.S. Without immigrants, this country will start the slow decline that has already taken root in Japan and is just beginning to be felt in China and South Korea. Russia is speeding up the process of depopulating its country by sacrificing an entire generation of young men on a pointless war. Europe is starting to being the population decline too, slowed only by immigration, much like the situation in this country. Currently U.S. citizens have birth rate well below the 2.1 needed for a stable population, and if we wanted to actually grow our population without immigration the replacement rate would be higher than that. I don't see Americans going back to big families any time soon. So we do need immigrants.

But we need a policy that controls who is coming in and encourages the immigrants most likely to be a net benefit to the country. The only way that's going to happen is if the parties stop playing the game of blaming each other for the immigration situation because it gets them votes and instead come together to do the job they were elected to do: enact legislation to fix the problem.
If I could, I'd fire most members of Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, for dereliction of duty. They spend more time raising money, grandstanding, and attacking the othe party than they do working to solve the problems of this country. That's not what they were elected to do and that's not what we are paying them a salary to do.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top