what are the liabilites and rights?

Status
Not open for further replies.

pwpeace

New Member
Rory is driving 27 MPH in a 25 MPH speed zone down a four lane street where it is posted that children are playing. Two children run into the street chasing a basketball. One nine-year-old child, Sean, runs into the street chasing the ball, sees the car, and dives out of the car's path. A second nine-year-old child, Conor, also runs into the street chasing the ball. However, Conor has a mental impairment that prevents him from jumping to safety in a timely manner and he is struck by Rory's car. Rory, without looking over his shoulder, swerves into the other lane to avoid Sean and Conor and in the process he hits a car, driven by Liam, which was traveling past him in the left-hand lane going in the same direction.

Liam loses control of his car, hits a telephone pole and is seriously and permanently injured in addition to being trapped in his car for a substantial period of time. The telephone pole, owned by the local phone company, Verizon, snaps into two pieces and hits Sean, who is still in the street, knocking him unconscious and resulting in permanent injuries.

Verizon did not do any testing of its poles to establish how easily the poles broke. The only factor used in manufacturing the poles was cost. The poles were made of low quality trees and were not treated in any significant manner except for a coating of tar. No reinforcement was used on the poles.
 
Rory is driving 27 MPH in a 25 MPH speed zone down a four lane street where it is posted that children are playing. Two children run into the street chasing a basketball. One nine-year-old child, Sean, runs into the street chasing the ball, sees the car, and dives out of the car's path. A second nine-year-old child, Conor, also runs into the street chasing the ball. However, Conor has a mental impairment that prevents him from jumping to safety in a timely manner and he is struck by Rory's car. Rory, without looking over his shoulder, swerves into the other lane to avoid Sean and Conor and in the process he hits a car, driven by Liam, which was traveling past him in the left-hand lane going in the same direction.

Liam loses control of his car, hits a telephone pole and is seriously and permanently injured in addition to being trapped in his car for a substantial period of time. The telephone pole, owned by the local phone company, Verizon, snaps into two pieces and hits Sean, who is still in the street, knocking him unconscious and resulting in permanent injuries.

Verizon did not do any testing of its poles to establish how easily the poles broke. The only factor used in manufacturing the poles was cost. The poles were made of low quality trees and were not treated in any significant manner except for a coating of tar. No reinforcement was used on the poles.

We don't do homework.
 
Sounds like a baby bar question.

*groan*

If it's a serious question, and not a homework question, give me hard evidence that it's truly an issue and I'll answer it for you (i.e. copy of a traffic collision report)
 
The key to your homework problem is the speed. Think about Verizon's responsibility to make the public safe from just such an accident. How much speed should the pole be able to take, did they find out, why not? How much did it take to snap this pole? This is a fairly easy proximate cause/duty to protect question. You shouldn't need help on this. Read your cases.
 
The parents of Conor are liable for allowing their boy to run around in the street unsupervised. The city is liable for not putting flashing lights and a mariachi band around the "Children at Play" sign. And the customers of Verizon have the right to bring a derivative action on behalf of the company against the manufacturer of the ball for building such a blatantly dangerous toy resulting in damage to their utility pole.
 
That's a real lawyer answer Dee_dub! Contributory negligence for everyone!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top