I appreciate your input because it gives me great insight to what the caseworker and counselor are thinking...possibly, but not saying to me.
My son's major challenge in coping and changing thus implementing some strategies he has a learning disability and through this has not always been encouraged to take the reigns although I know he can do many things if encouraged.
Even with a learning disability, you can make huge steps with your son (you know this

). He needs help, and perhaps you are going to be the primary source of that help.
I may not sound like it but I try to give this adult as much of the benefit of the doubt as possible. I obviously allowed the residency initially but I was told it is nothing and as it turns out it is almost everything. My divorce attorney said it was nothing, no big deal at all. This man is never happy, I mean never in a good mood and never ever wakes up less than irritated it is morning. It is almost impossible to live with someone who is like this. It is depressing for anyone. It takes massive coping skills.
While that's true, you don't live with him any more. He could well have adopted a completely new attitude.
Your attorney was mistaken, and that's where the problem lies - residency is a HUGE thing because, once it's decided, it's very difficult to change without a change in the child's circumstances (unless, of course, the parents agree) or something serious happening to the custodial parent (jail, for example).
I agree it is on my head but I still advocate for a change in his primary residence and wonder why this is such a far fetched idea. If I am the parent willing to put his needs first and go the extra mile then he should reside with me and this is a legal issue.
Here's the thing. You decided that Dad was fit to be primary custodian; for that to now change, you'll need to prove a change in kiddo's circumstances...you wanting him with you isn't enough, nor is kiddo wanting to move. It may sound harsh, but it's also the truth.
I wish there was a way to file a modification without a 2000 dollar retainer fee.
The thing is, you haven't really shown anything to justify a modification.
(They can be done pro se, by the way - you don't need an attorney, you just need to learn about how it's done and most districts have great self-help resources).
The one it hurts the most is the child for not having this done. It would be easier to to allow him/them to maneuver the daily routine but I want his life to be as it should be for a child and ignoring his stress is not fair to him in the long run. If it was better I would gladly work around my-ex's inability to work as a co-parent. It is not ever just an easy day so I feel compelled to work towards an answer. On Sunday when he realizes he has to go back to all the BS I can see his heart sink. This occurs especially after having 2-3 days of being a kid, no fighting, lots of laughter and attention as well as encouragement. It is written all over his face that he dreads going back.
So is his therapist documenting this? Does the therapist believe that living with Dad is detrimental?
Who knows what gang, it isn't like they live somewhere that this is clearly defined. I am sure he knows for himself but I do not. I do know he will not give up the income he receives from the Dad for all these years.
Not just rough housing absolutely not. He doesn't sell them but uses the drugs. I know this for a fact. It is a matter of time before he pays the consequences I imagine. those consequences being both in his health and legal. I agree the phone is a sound solution and hope my child does not have it taken away.
Unless you can PROVE that Dad isn't just using, but endangering your son while he's using, it may not be as big an issue as you think. Of course it may also depend on the drug - the courts see a huge difference between meth and pot, for example.
I as I before mentioned appreciate your insight. I wish I knew more about the exact issues that have an impact on the change of residency so I could re-evaluate what is done with regards to his weekly regime and would be more pertinent to a legal point of view. I would never lie but I realize what I may think is an issue may not be accepted as an issue however other incidences that I am loosing sight of my be just such a deal breaker.
If you can show that your son living with Dad is actually detrimental to his wellbeing - ie, if your son's therapist can attest to this - then your task will be much easier. But outside of that, you'll have to either show that Dad is unfit or, again, that something in kiddo's circumstances have changed.
Many issues I haven't covered because it is just a lot of details but it does really help to think about how the authoritative body's ]that be].....may be processing the information I am giving them. Issues important to me are just not that big of an issue however I hope other issues resonate as completely unacceptable.
Unfortunately, your biggest issue is that you basically said that you thought Dad was fit to be the custodial parent - it will be, without something changing, difficult to un-ring that bell.
I'm sorry I don't have better news for you.