Jkilcourse
New Member
- Jurisdiction
- Virginia
In January of this year, I signed a lease agreement for 6 months with an apartment complex. The first month was prorated and stipulated the dates within the contract from January 3rd to February 2nd. For the first month I paid from the 3rd to the 30th of January. On July 2 ( end of contract term), I decided to move to a month to month basis, and agreed to an addition three month on a month to month basis agreement. I was told that the lease would end for this three month to month basis on October 2nd. I presumed that although I'm on a month to month basis, the provisions and dates of the original contract would be followed in customary practice. On September 29th I cleared the apartment. Two days ago I get a message from the landlord that said I owed them money thru the 2nd of
October. They rationalized their position stating that I was on a month to month payment 1-30th) but my terms within the contract were until the 2nd of each month and thus I owed them for the additional two days.
So my understanding is the first month (January) was prorated after that I would revert to a month to month payment (1-30). No problem. But what I'm finsimg is that they are still holding me to the terms of the agreement which were 3rd to the 2nd of the month, and then turning around and telling me that they charge me rent from the 1-30, and asking me to pay them for an additional two days?
Need some legal logic here.
October. They rationalized their position stating that I was on a month to month payment 1-30th) but my terms within the contract were until the 2nd of each month and thus I owed them for the additional two days.
So my understanding is the first month (January) was prorated after that I would revert to a month to month payment (1-30). No problem. But what I'm finsimg is that they are still holding me to the terms of the agreement which were 3rd to the 2nd of the month, and then turning around and telling me that they charge me rent from the 1-30, and asking me to pay them for an additional two days?
Need some legal logic here.