Judge vacated & transferred case

B

Bartoonland

Guest
Jurisdiction
Illinois
Judge transferred case to county where both parties reside, without motion from any parties involved & vacating an upcoming court date.

A motion to transfer the case a few years ago was filed & denied by the standing judge on the order. No residencies have changed since that denial.

It has now been Judge rotation year & a new judge was assigned to the case. A motion for something else was filed by the plaintiff, but not for transfer if case. It is a family case involving Plaintiff -Mother, Defendant-Father & Third Party Interveners- paternal Grandparents. Mother has filed a motion to remove third party Interveners (us) from the order in which we share visitation with The father (our son). We have a trial court date on 3/9, but got a notice from the court house yesterday stating it is transferring the file to the county in which the parties live & vacates all court dates.

Not comprehending that the judge can transfer the case to another county without request from either parties especially if a request previously has been denied.

Enlighten me! Does the new assigned county notify of a new court date on the pending petitions/motions? Does everything need to be re filed? Do we show up this week at the scheduled hearing & question the judge's judgement? All parties are pro-se.
 
Not comprehending that the judge can transfer the case to another county without request from either parties especially if a request previously has been denied.

There's nothing to "comprehend." The judge has the power to make that ruling and that's what he did.

the new assigned county notify of a new court date on the pending petitions/motions?

Call the new court and ask if the file has been processed and if and when a new hearing date will be scheduled.

Does everything need to be re filed?

Probably not. But I wouldn't want to guarantee it.

Do we show up this week at the scheduled hearing

You wrote that the court dates were vacated so there is nothing to show up to.

question the judge's judgement?

Seriously? Do you really think that's a good idea?

All parties are pro-se.

That explains why this is unresolved after a couple of years.
 
Back
Top