dadtothree
New Member
Hello! My ex girlfriend and I have an 8 year old son. We have court documents for custody and visitation that are 8 years old. The papers only spelled out visitation for our son's first year and we planned on revising them when he turned one. The papers specifically say, "9/2/00(his birthdate)- 12/1/00" and lists that schedule, "12/2/00-3/1/01" and lists that schedule and finally, "3/2/01-9/1/01" and lists that schedule. It mentions nothing beyond that first year. I then made the terrible decision of not being involved in my son's life at all for 4 years. I have been back in his life, consistently, for 3 years now. He has done wonderfully and my ex has been fairly cooperative. We're having a difficult time agreeing to a permanent visitation schedule now that the transition period is over and everything has gone well.
My question is: Since the original court-ordered visitation schedule was never modified, is the most recent schedule (what is listed for "3/2/01-9/1/01") still in effect and enforceable?
I asked an attorney who said that it was not- that it only covered through 9/1/01 and that now there is no court-ordered visitation schedule. My ex says that because that is the only paperwork on file with the courts and was never modified, the visitation schedule is still in effect and can be legally enforced. I called the Circuit Court's office, where the papers are filed, and they said that they could not "interpret the court order". Does anyone have any idea how this works? Thanks for your help!
My question is: Since the original court-ordered visitation schedule was never modified, is the most recent schedule (what is listed for "3/2/01-9/1/01") still in effect and enforceable?
I asked an attorney who said that it was not- that it only covered through 9/1/01 and that now there is no court-ordered visitation schedule. My ex says that because that is the only paperwork on file with the courts and was never modified, the visitation schedule is still in effect and can be legally enforced. I called the Circuit Court's office, where the papers are filed, and they said that they could not "interpret the court order". Does anyone have any idea how this works? Thanks for your help!