- Jurisdiction
- D.C.
Software_PACK_OWNER: The company owns the Software_PACK library, a software component for generating DOCX documents.
PLATFORM_PROVIDER: The technology partner responsible for implementing and maintaining the platform used by END_USER. PLATFORM_PROVIDER procured OEM licenses for Software_PACK but needed to apply them properly.
END_USER: The end-user of the platform managed by PLATFORM_PROVIDER, which includes the Software_PACK library for generating DOCX documents.
Non-Compliance: END_USER has been flagged by Software_PACK_OWNER for non-compliance due to using an unlicensed version of Software_PACK in the platform.
Licensing Oversight: PLATFORM_PROVIDER had originally procured OEM licenses for Software_PACK to deploy them in the END_USER project but failed to do so. This was acknowledged as an oversight by PLATFORM_PROVIDER.
Financial Liability: Software_PACK_OWNER initially claimed that END_USER needs to pay a certain amount to resolve past non-compliance.
As END_USER, what would you recommend I do from a legal perspective?
PLATFORM_PROVIDER: The technology partner responsible for implementing and maintaining the platform used by END_USER. PLATFORM_PROVIDER procured OEM licenses for Software_PACK but needed to apply them properly.
END_USER: The end-user of the platform managed by PLATFORM_PROVIDER, which includes the Software_PACK library for generating DOCX documents.
Non-Compliance: END_USER has been flagged by Software_PACK_OWNER for non-compliance due to using an unlicensed version of Software_PACK in the platform.
Licensing Oversight: PLATFORM_PROVIDER had originally procured OEM licenses for Software_PACK to deploy them in the END_USER project but failed to do so. This was acknowledged as an oversight by PLATFORM_PROVIDER.
Financial Liability: Software_PACK_OWNER initially claimed that END_USER needs to pay a certain amount to resolve past non-compliance.
As END_USER, what would you recommend I do from a legal perspective?