false charge listed - not the usual circumstance Criminal Records, Expungement

when I say we I am referring to his lawyer. again, trying to save time typing.

 

a time saving tactic that has no relevance to the question I'm asking.

 

487(a)- count 1
496(a) - count 2 and 3 and 4

 

again, had the attorney done his job correctly I wouldn't be here. lets stop with the back and forth and get back to the original question, please.

 

count 1 - 497a
2,3,4 - 496a

the same items, btw. same event.

 

would that still be the same since he didn't get out of cya until he was 25?

 

I was thinking it might be beneficial to clear up the mistake first to reduce enhancements I'm case he loses the current case.

 

you know, looking at the complaint it looks like the first charge is for stealing the property, while charges 2,3,4 are for receipt of stolen property. but the property is the same as I'm count 1. Can they do that? I read there were rules about charging two crimes for one event.

 

my

my mistake. it was 496(a) for counts 2,3,4

 

but what if the first court was wrong and we can now prove it. it was adjudicated, there was no jury.

 

there has to be some recourse in this situation. they can't expect a minor in cya to review his paperwork. there was no jury to catch the mistake, it was up to one judge. this should all count for something and if it doesn't I'd say try anyway and appeal it to a higher court to try to change the rules.

 

c

the case could be made that the judge/court wasn't competent as no competent court would make such an error.