My 14 year old daughter signed up to try out for a volleyball team. She wenty through the tryouts and was selected for the team. There were fees of close to $1000 for the team. We made the tryout payments and started making payments for the team fees. My daughter decided after one practice that she was not going to play. We informed the team manager that we were no longer going to participate. We thought that was the end of it. A month or so later we were served papers from the Sheriff that we were being sued for the remainder of the money for the team.
We were totally blindsided and just thought that it was so ridiculous that we just showed up and thought the judge would throw the case out of court. Although it was something that the judge waivered back and forth on for quite some time, he found that even though we were never presented with a contract to sign, that emails between my wife and the coach constituted a contract. We appealed the decision and go to court again next week. I have done extensive research adn all of my research does show that emails can be a binding contract. But what I am also seeing is that the emails must have the terms of the contract within the email chain somewhere. And the emails must meet the "meeting of the minds" criteria where both parties understand that the emails are a contract.
Can you define the "Meeting of the Minds" legal definition?
Are there some cases that you are aware of that I can cite in court that show that emails can't be a contract without meeting the criteria?
Is there any advice for me? (other than making my daughter finish what she starts?)
We were totally blindsided and just thought that it was so ridiculous that we just showed up and thought the judge would throw the case out of court. Although it was something that the judge waivered back and forth on for quite some time, he found that even though we were never presented with a contract to sign, that emails between my wife and the coach constituted a contract. We appealed the decision and go to court again next week. I have done extensive research adn all of my research does show that emails can be a binding contract. But what I am also seeing is that the emails must have the terms of the contract within the email chain somewhere. And the emails must meet the "meeting of the minds" criteria where both parties understand that the emails are a contract.
Can you define the "Meeting of the Minds" legal definition?
Are there some cases that you are aware of that I can cite in court that show that emails can't be a contract without meeting the criteria?
Is there any advice for me? (other than making my daughter finish what she starts?)