My jurisdiction is: Washington, D.C.
My jurisdiction is: District of Columbia
Dee_dub, I would appreciate your advice about this. Anyone else who is familiar with my previous posts (threads of 7-21 re: release of claims and 7-31 re: implications of terminated contract/lack of refund clause, which provide the background for the situation), is also welcome to comment. Thanks in advance.
The saga continues. Today I received an e-mail from a 3rd party (a principal in a website who I was registered with and who is in a position to refer clients to me) stating that my ex-client (the one I have the dispute with) informed him that I contracted for work and didn't complete it. He asked for my side of the story, and I provided him with barebones details, making it clear to him that the ex-client didn't contact me through his website (and provided proof in addition to his own company's records), so therefore he and his company have nothing to do with the matter. The 3rd party was satisfied with my response and emphasized that he was only making sure that the work had not been contracted as a result of my association with his website.
But now I have the impression that the ex-client is attempting to damage my reputation by googling my name and contacting anyone who is professionally associated with me. That is how I assume he got the name of the third party party mentioned above and decided to contact him and his company.
Clearly, I'm dealing with someone who's unreasonable. As you know, I offered a partial refund contingent on the ex-client's signature and acceptance of a release of claims within a week. The time frame has passed, and there has been no word from the ex-client. It seems that he has initiated a smear campaign against me, and I'm thinking about sending an e-mail or letter (the problem is that I don't have the ex-client's current addressed as he recently moved and is out of the country) regarding the consequences of further attempts to damage my reputation/defamation. I realize that one option is to do nothing and I'm not looking to escalate the matter. However, I also feel strongly about protecting my reputation. What do you advise in this regard?
Thanks very much for your help and advice.
My jurisdiction is: District of Columbia
Dee_dub, I would appreciate your advice about this. Anyone else who is familiar with my previous posts (threads of 7-21 re: release of claims and 7-31 re: implications of terminated contract/lack of refund clause, which provide the background for the situation), is also welcome to comment. Thanks in advance.
The saga continues. Today I received an e-mail from a 3rd party (a principal in a website who I was registered with and who is in a position to refer clients to me) stating that my ex-client (the one I have the dispute with) informed him that I contracted for work and didn't complete it. He asked for my side of the story, and I provided him with barebones details, making it clear to him that the ex-client didn't contact me through his website (and provided proof in addition to his own company's records), so therefore he and his company have nothing to do with the matter. The 3rd party was satisfied with my response and emphasized that he was only making sure that the work had not been contracted as a result of my association with his website.
But now I have the impression that the ex-client is attempting to damage my reputation by googling my name and contacting anyone who is professionally associated with me. That is how I assume he got the name of the third party party mentioned above and decided to contact him and his company.
Clearly, I'm dealing with someone who's unreasonable. As you know, I offered a partial refund contingent on the ex-client's signature and acceptance of a release of claims within a week. The time frame has passed, and there has been no word from the ex-client. It seems that he has initiated a smear campaign against me, and I'm thinking about sending an e-mail or letter (the problem is that I don't have the ex-client's current addressed as he recently moved and is out of the country) regarding the consequences of further attempts to damage my reputation/defamation. I realize that one option is to do nothing and I'm not looking to escalate the matter. However, I also feel strongly about protecting my reputation. What do you advise in this regard?
Thanks very much for your help and advice.
Last edited: