- Jurisdiction
- California
Hello,
I recently bought a newly built townhouse in Hayward, California. The Seller said that the property came with an AT&T Telephone Land Line. The reality is that because of complications with The Builder and their relationship (or lack thereof) with AT&T, the conduit from the nearest street through the newly built street to my house was not completed. AT&T is blaming The Builder. And The Builder is blaming AT&T. The bottom line is that I still don't have a land line for this house and it looks like I may never have one. I have been working on this issue for 3 months with both The Builder and AT&T and just now learning that basically The Builder would have to tear up the street to install the proper conduit and I feel like they are terribly unwilling to do that at this point in time since the project is "completed" to them. What legal recourse do I have, please? (Thank you.)
I recently bought a newly built townhouse in Hayward, California. The Seller said that the property came with an AT&T Telephone Land Line. The reality is that because of complications with The Builder and their relationship (or lack thereof) with AT&T, the conduit from the nearest street through the newly built street to my house was not completed. AT&T is blaming The Builder. And The Builder is blaming AT&T. The bottom line is that I still don't have a land line for this house and it looks like I may never have one. I have been working on this issue for 3 months with both The Builder and AT&T and just now learning that basically The Builder would have to tear up the street to install the proper conduit and I feel like they are terribly unwilling to do that at this point in time since the project is "completed" to them. What legal recourse do I have, please? (Thank you.)