Alcohol & Drugs: MIP, MIC, Intoxication alphabet Agents questioning soldier while at Army unit

[paratrooper]

Alphabet letter enforcement agents approach a service member's(SM) chain of command who allow them to use a unit conference room to set up reserve service member to come to the unit while NOT on duty/drill/etc.. and badger and coehoer said SM into making statement that ultimately gets SM indicted on very serious federal charges not military service related. Regardless that said location is government property, Are there regulations that prohibit this /or violations that took place between alphabet agency and Army unit commander to allow this constituting any statement/evidence aquired to be rendered invalid..

 

[army judge]

Alphabet letter enforcement agents approach a service member's(SM) chain of command who allow them to use a unit conference room to set up reserve service member to come to the unit while NOT on duty/drill/etc.. and badger and coehoer said SM into making statement that ultimately gets SM indicted on very serious federal charges not military service related. Regardless that said location is government property, Are there regulations that prohibit this /or violations that took place between alphabet agency and Army unit commander to allow this constituting any statement/evidence aquired to be rendered invalid..

You're asking if the statement given was coerced or possibly inadmissible in court, right? It just might be inadmissible in a federal court proceeding.

Was this a federal law enforcement agency? Which one.

Is/was the reservist on active duty or reserve weekend duty?

Did the interrogation occur on a military base or in an army reserve building?

Is the charge a felony or a misdemeanor?

Is the "victim/confessor" in federal custody?

Was the "victim/confessor" Mirandized before the interrogation or before "the light of suspicion was shined on them"?

Has the "confessor" obtained an attorney?

Is it a private attorney or a public defender?

 

[paratrooper]

1. SM feels statement was coehered, meanings, they said one thing, the agent added " a conversation about making money(intent to conspire?) SM said no, not knowing the details about anothers' conversation that he/she was not physically witness to the conversation about 'making money'' but was in vehicle of restarant where meeting took place, same ? was asked and asked until SM agreed to that statement, he/she cracked partially under the pressure. in-admissability would be ideal

2. 4-Delta Echo Alpha from parent and accused states, with 3-Foxtrot Bravo from parent state just present.

3. reserve NOT on paid drill, was there to re-enlist on same day i believe

4.reserve building.

5.fed. felony conspiracy to deliver MJ

6. awaiting arraignment very soon in accused state, arraignment in parent state already done.

7. no miranda ever. was advised during interregation that at THAT time not charged, but would be if no statement made, sit locked up over weekend until transportation to accused state, 2 weeks to see lawyer, threatened families lives... a collage of interesting threats/scare tactics..

8.yes, but questions attorneys ability, but not hunger for money private

 

[army judge]

1. SM feels statement was coehered, meanings, they said one thing, the agent added " a conversation about making money(intent to conspire?) SM said no, not knowing the details about anothers' conversation that he/she was not physically witness to the conversation about 'making money'' but was in vehicle of restarant where meeting took place, same ? was asked and asked until SM agreed to that statement, he/she cracked partially under the pressure. in-admissability would be ideal

2. 4-Delta Echo Alpha from parent and accused states, with 3-Foxtrot Bravo from parent state just present.

3. reserve NOT on paid drill, was there to re-enlist on same day i believe

4.reserve building.

5.fed. felony conspiracy to deliver MJ

6. awaiting arraignment very soon in accused state, arraignment in parent state already done.

7. no miranda ever. was advised during interregation that at THAT time not charged, but would be if no statement made, sit locked up over weekend until transportation to accused state, 2 weeks to see lawyer, threatened families lives... a collage of interesting threats/scare tactics..

8.yes, but questions attorneys ability, but not hunger for money private

The person has some plausible defenses.

Problem is the statement made by the person.

Never, ever, ever admit to anything.

Sitting in a jail cell isn't forever, and you are able to bond out directly to the court in the federal system.

Speak with other lawyer's immediately about this problem.

Make sure the lawyer is admitted to federal practice and has extensive "Delta Romeo Uniform Golf" representation experience.

It'll be a tough fight, but escape holes do exist.

By the way, all of number seven us garbage and lies. That could be coercion. I'm sure there is a recording of it somewhere.