14th admendment

[Rayc]

Why is it that 90 percent of attorney's wont discuss your right to travel as an individual in an automobile. the revelation that the American citizen has always had the inalienable right to travel raises profound questions to those who are involved in making and enforcing state laws. if all officers of the court are sworn to uphold all your rights how can they act as if certain rights don't exist. Lets just go over the terms of the dmv 1 driver one employed in conducting a coach , carriage, wagon , or other vehicle with horses or self powered. Bouviers law dictionary 3rd revision, 8th edition, 1984 reprint page 940. Employed< bouviers law dictionary page 1035 The act of doing a thing and being under contract or orders to do it. U.S v Morris , 14 Pet (U.S)464, 475; U.Sv Cathrine, 2 Paine, 721, fed,. case. No. 14,755 and 3 License Bouviers law dictionary, page 1976 authority to do some act or carry on some business, in its nature lawful put prohibited by statute except with the permission of the civil authority or which would otherwise be unlawful. See examples Gibbons v Ogden1 U.S 1, 71, 72,, 77,124, 132-132, 137, 139 , 213. Guess my question is what makes it okay for sworn officers to violate an oath because they have ideological beliefs different than what they sworn to do thereby creating a conspiracy using a " mala prohibita " matter to defraud American's of their constitutional rights. The police power of the state is valid as it relates to commerce, not as to private rights and to protect the health , safety and welfare of the public as it relates to the manner in which trade or commerce is carried on in the public. (U.SSupreme court stated in munn v Ilinois, 94 U.S 113- 116 ) case law goes on and on in favor of the 14th admendment it is overwhelming . Any statute or legislation that runs parallel to supreme court decisions is tyranicl because it seeks to bind a constutional right.

 

[army judge]

Good bye. Good good bye. Good bye. Good bye.

 

[Michael Wechsler]

Why is it that 90 percent of attorney's wont discuss your right to travel as an individual in an automobile.

Because most people travel in their automobile without a problem? Quite frankly, I'm not sure what the problem you're complaining about actually is. You haven't specified one. From the end of your post, which was snipped off because it directed users to go elsewhere, most would probably believe that this post was purely for marketing purposes.

 

[army judge]

Because most people travel in their automobile without a problem? Quite frankly, I'm not sure what the problem you're complaining about actually is. You haven't specified one. From the end of your post, which was snipped off because it directed users to go elsewhere, most would probably believe that this post was purely for marketing purposes.

Hello, professor, this is a person upset with being adjudicated a sexual offender in MA. He feels the lifetime registration requirement is an annoying burden, and violates his rights. We've attempted to reason with him, but he continued to spam the forum. He is prone to doing what Gd did for Jesus, and resurrecting himself occasionally.

He has added a new trick to his repertoire, spoofing his ISP. ROTFL.