Search results

I agree. It seems you have a good argument to make, however if you hope to remain friends you might find a way to resolve this without going to court.

If the officer made an error on the citation the court will send it back to him for correction. The back of the officer's copy of the citation will have notes about the incident so he can easily recall and fix it. You would get a copy of any correction before any court date.

Yes. Give the money back and you will be fine.

If the loans were paid to your step father I would have to say the money was his, not yours. Without some kind of contract obligating him to pay your debts I don't think you are going to have much of an argument. What reason does he give for not paying the debt. Is the money owed to the school...

I don't think so. The company apparantly refused a refund a year ago and did not honor the right to cancel at any time before delivery as promised. Seems a pretty reasonable argument to make, but chasing $599 from Europe is probably not worth it.

If his concern is that information divulged in conversation with the public defender might somehow be used against him then he will have to wait until that happens to address it. Until then there is no action to take other than to seek private counsel. Pro se is not the smart way to go.

DUI is not the type of serious crime that would be a permanent roadblock to citizenship. Your friend likely just needed enough time to pass and might have no trouble now.

Did you ask the store to cover your medical expense?

It appears 3202 was simply a sentence enhancement. Having been convicted for the other 4 offenses the penalty was increased because of the weapon. I don't see that you have a good argument to make unless you are wanting to dispute there was a weapon involved.

Will this just got even more silly. I had thought you were the one who actually served the papers on the property.

If she is being charged with a possession offense it seems that should eliminate his possession offense.

Unless you are leaving out significant details I suspect your appointed counsel can make easy work of this. You are one of many clients though. You'll have to be patient. The prosecution will have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that your presence was not lawful in order for you to be convicted.

My main question for you is if the Florida order is causing you some kind of trouble. Perhaps something employment related or the ability to obtain firearms? If not, why bother? Let it run its course. You aren't going to contact her an anyway, so what harm is in the order? If it is just about...

Stop, yes. Search, no. Not based on the information information given. Nothing more than a cursory pat down of the male would have been reasonable. A search of the female would have required consent, which she may well have given, but could have refused.

I would expect the firearm was confiscated and would be treated for fingerprints. If your fingerprints are in it you are dead in the water. Author some physical evidence you were in possession of a furearm I would think you have a reasonable chance of escaping this with good counsel. Eyewitness...

Just curious... What is the exact criminal statute you are accused of violating?

It would be miles beyond stupid to allow a 16 year old runaway to move in with you.

You COULD be found at fault. Green lights do not magically stop cross traffic. You are supposed to proceed when clear. You may have entered the intersection when it was not yet safe to do so.

This sounds silly. A person serving legal papers is not trespassing, regardless of the sign.

Your problem is that you willingly put yourself in the way of the vehicle. The protection order should resolve the problem... Follow through with a full restraining order that forces her from the home. Report every single violation.