almagrande
New Member
I'm filing Chapter 7.
I received an objection to discharge from an attorney stating that she represents bank "X". She says I charged a credit card from "X" into the 90 days limit before the BK filing.
And says it was luxurious items and cash advances, and that I made fraud.
I responded with a motion to dismiss objection to discharge that
*I don't know any bank "X".
*Bank "X" must be in possession of the original note to be entitled to make a claim.
*I didn't make any luxury purchases in that period in any card.
*I didn't make any cash advances in that period in any card.
We have now a hearing in 3 weeks from now.
I have proof all of that was for business expenses: Photos, gifts cards, an expensive business seminar, phone services, internet, which with all of this we thought to earn more money to pay back all of our debts.
My question is: is that OK to call the attorney and say this? Because she thinks everythign was a personal expense as luxury. I'm afraid that she may take that info to her advantage.
I don't know.
Additionally, the note was signed with bank "Y" one year before. (I didn't state that in the motion)
Any thoughts?
Thanks
I received an objection to discharge from an attorney stating that she represents bank "X". She says I charged a credit card from "X" into the 90 days limit before the BK filing.
And says it was luxurious items and cash advances, and that I made fraud.
I responded with a motion to dismiss objection to discharge that
*I don't know any bank "X".
*Bank "X" must be in possession of the original note to be entitled to make a claim.
*I didn't make any luxury purchases in that period in any card.
*I didn't make any cash advances in that period in any card.
We have now a hearing in 3 weeks from now.
I have proof all of that was for business expenses: Photos, gifts cards, an expensive business seminar, phone services, internet, which with all of this we thought to earn more money to pay back all of our debts.
My question is: is that OK to call the attorney and say this? Because she thinks everythign was a personal expense as luxury. I'm afraid that she may take that info to her advantage.
I don't know.
Additionally, the note was signed with bank "Y" one year before. (I didn't state that in the motion)
Any thoughts?
Thanks
