Shoplifting, Larceny, Robbery, Theft theft by recieving stolen prperty-x9

[yunghustlain706]

i need some help knowing if i can beat thiscaselet me know what u all think. the cops came in my house and found several stolen items. i was the only one present at the time. they have no witnesses or statements at this time.

 

[seniorjudge]

I think you need to hire a lawyer.

Yesterday.

 

[CdwJava]

i need some help knowing if i can beat thiscaselet me know what u all think.

I think that using complete and proper words along with proper sentence structure would help.

the cops came in my house and found several stolen items. i was the only one present at the time. they have no witnesses or statements at this time.

Okay ... they have you in possession of stolen property. You don't mention what state you are in, but that is usually a felony.

What's your argument as to how the items got into your possession? A mysterious person whom you do not know and have no way to contact gave them to you?

It's time to consult legal counsel, friend.

- Carl

 

[scareof3strikes]

i think it is hard for d.a. to proof. is there any victim claim those items? bs charge.

 

[CdwJava]

i think it is hard for d.a. to proof. is there any victim claim those items? bs charge.

If they KNOW the items are stolen, they have a victim. The items have almost certainly been identified as being the property of another through serial numbers, description, or identification by the victim.

The proof is really not all that hard. Now, the defendant needs to show that he had no idea all this property was stolen ... usually we find that the story involves some mystery person that gave it to them or sold it for a ridiculously low price.

Since we have no idea what info the police have, we can't say how strong the case is. But, I have found that we usually have a good case for possession of stolen property when we find multiple items int he possession of the same person .. it's called "a clue."

- Carl

 

[scareof3strikes]

If they KNOW the items are stolen, they have a victim. The items have almost certainly been identified as being the property of another through serial numbers, description, or identification by the victim.

The proof is really not all that hard. Now, the defendant needs to show that he had no idea all this property was stolen ... usually we find that the story involves some mystery person that gave it to them or sold it for a ridiculously low price.

Since we have no idea what info the police have, we can't say how strong the case is. But, I have found that we usually have a good case for possession of stolen property when we find multiple items int he possession of the same person .. it's called "a clue."

- Carl

you are right but lets look at this situation, what if it is a ipod or itouch. do you know how many people have the same item? unless it is a unique or engraved the victim name on it then you cant denied that. other wise, any body could said is there and u could claim it was yours. either way, no one knows but god.

 

[CdwJava]

you are right but lets look at this situation, what if it is a ipod or itouch. do you know how many people have the same item? unless it is a unique or engraved the victim name on it then you cant denied that. other wise, any body could said is there and u could claim it was yours. either way, no one knows but god.

Okay ... if it was so generic, HOW would they even think to charge for possession of stolen property? The prime element in the offense is that the person be in possession of property they know to be stolen or should have reasonably have known to be stolen.

If they searched some guys house and found some iPods, he wouldn't have been charged with possession of stolen property now would he?

- Carl

 

[scareof3strikes]

exactly cause that my points. it must be a speciality item. i know someone got charge of recieving a stolen property and it is an IPod. i told him that d.a. cant proved that unless the victim engraved his/her name on the back or have the series number matched the ipod. if the d.a. doesnt have that it is a weak case.