I'm hoping to derive some information about the legal process, especially dealing Federal Rules & Procedure and what are justifiable actions from a defense attorney who has pulled something on me that I don't believe is justifiable in anyway!? I'm Pro Se at present but maybe not for long if I can find the right attorney?
I filed a suit against my insurance co for, Bad Faith Claim, Breach of the Covenient etc. in Ca. Superior court and shortly thereafter the case was moved to Federal Court but with no notice to me of any kind that it was about to happen!
I don't believe that's according to the Federal Rules of Civil Proceedure and would like some input. They have also pulled other stunts too!
One of the reasons they gave in havine the suit moved was Diversity of Citizenship as the Ins.Co. is located in an Eastern state. I find this reason to be moot as the Ins. Co. willingly conducts business here in Ca. and reaps millions in profit from Ca. yet has their home office in the East by their choice. If an Ins.Co. does business in Ca. they are governed by the laws of Ca. and not their home state and they hire Ca. attorneys to fight for them here anyway so again the diversity issue seems utterly moot! Also I seriously doubt anyone from the main office even considers comming out for trial??
Your input is appreciated, David
I filed a suit against my insurance co for, Bad Faith Claim, Breach of the Covenient etc. in Ca. Superior court and shortly thereafter the case was moved to Federal Court but with no notice to me of any kind that it was about to happen!
I don't believe that's according to the Federal Rules of Civil Proceedure and would like some input. They have also pulled other stunts too!
One of the reasons they gave in havine the suit moved was Diversity of Citizenship as the Ins.Co. is located in an Eastern state. I find this reason to be moot as the Ins. Co. willingly conducts business here in Ca. and reaps millions in profit from Ca. yet has their home office in the East by their choice. If an Ins.Co. does business in Ca. they are governed by the laws of Ca. and not their home state and they hire Ca. attorneys to fight for them here anyway so again the diversity issue seems utterly moot! Also I seriously doubt anyone from the main office even considers comming out for trial??
Your input is appreciated, David