- Jurisdiction
- Idaho
I am Plaintiff, I won in Small Claims but on a limited scope/award.
I filed appeal.
New hearing date has been set.
Defendant already issued required Pleading.
In Pleading, Defendant used their name but also seems to be striving for eventual corporate veil protection of some sort. I note this due to some of their language in pleading but also blatant use in heading e.g. Plaintiff VS Tim Jones aka Tim Jones Construction INC and starting statement "Tim Jones Construction INC entered into a remodeling contract with".
I only state this to try and clarify: In Appeal Order it states "If either party is other than an individual...must be represented by an attorney.
So would Defendant be forced to have an attorney?
Would court issue default judgement in my favor if they dont?
If court did not issue default judgement in my favor - would they stipulate for record that defendant is entitled or is not entitled to corporate veil protection of any sort?
I filed appeal.
New hearing date has been set.
Defendant already issued required Pleading.
In Pleading, Defendant used their name but also seems to be striving for eventual corporate veil protection of some sort. I note this due to some of their language in pleading but also blatant use in heading e.g. Plaintiff VS Tim Jones aka Tim Jones Construction INC and starting statement "Tim Jones Construction INC entered into a remodeling contract with".
I only state this to try and clarify: In Appeal Order it states "If either party is other than an individual...must be represented by an attorney.
So would Defendant be forced to have an attorney?
Would court issue default judgement in my favor if they dont?
If court did not issue default judgement in my favor - would they stipulate for record that defendant is entitled or is not entitled to corporate veil protection of any sort?