This will be my second traffic pro se traffic trial. The first should have been for speeding but the cop took pitty when he saw my CDL and charged me with not wearing a seat belt which I removed prior to get to my wallet where my DL was kept. I took it to trial and my passenger acted as witness.....found NOT guilty.
Now I need to show a reasonable doubt in a new speeding issue that radar had possible interference because it was aimed in close proximity to a high voltage substation. See docs.google.com/document/d/1Lk6igXqW57cgFUuFHI7DuDPVYee0w-1M5ecjbUmkG6k/edit for an overhead view. (You might have to add http before this link, had to remove that because they wouldnt let me post a URL if my posting were under 15....fooy)
Does anyone have additional information that can support this interference claim and be introduced at trial?
I plan to argue first that I have not been properly told what the specific speeding violation is because the copy of the issued citation is NOT legible enough to identify the specific number of the Ohio Rev Code.
Comments?
Now I need to show a reasonable doubt in a new speeding issue that radar had possible interference because it was aimed in close proximity to a high voltage substation. See docs.google.com/document/d/1Lk6igXqW57cgFUuFHI7DuDPVYee0w-1M5ecjbUmkG6k/edit for an overhead view. (You might have to add http before this link, had to remove that because they wouldnt let me post a URL if my posting were under 15....fooy)
Does anyone have additional information that can support this interference claim and be introduced at trial?
I plan to argue first that I have not been properly told what the specific speeding violation is because the copy of the issued citation is NOT legible enough to identify the specific number of the Ohio Rev Code.
Comments?