The only part I definitely agree with you on is the ex parte communications between the Judge and the other party. He should not be "getting other information" outside of the court that influences his decision. Now THAT is reversible error. Get that on the record at the next hearing.
He can however change his mind for any reason at all. He can hear a bit of something, stop them and stay his ruling until everyone can be heard. That is not error.
I'll deal with your statements one at a time:
1. ATTORNEY was barred from objecting to ruling as he did not show
A: That's reasonable. No shows don't get to object.
2. Attorney was in violation by sending Judge personal letter not filed and recorded.
A: A judge should not entertain ex parte communications, true. However, he can hear bits and pieces and if he thinks there may be something interesting in it he can stay an order and hear the full matter later. There is no harm done in that.
3. Attorney knowingly and deliberately misled Judge w/false info to change ruling and it worked
A: An attorney mislead a Judge? Say it ain't so! All joking aside his argument is his argument. Of course you are going to be contrary to it. The Judge has not yet "changed" his ruling he has stayed his ruling until a full hearing can be had. Thats ok.
4. Judge was in violation for reading letter and then acting on it as it was not reliable and it usurped the adversary system by not notifying me to oppose.
A: You have a point but the Judge only issued a stay. That's reasonable. A Judge can hear a Motion for a temporary stay Ex Parte. It's done all the time. If he issued a final ruling on that communication it would be different. You have notice and opportunity to be heard at the full hearing.
5. Judge denied me to respond on the record as we were in the Hall and talk not recorded.
A: That was the proper thing to do. You will have the opportunity to respond at the hearing.
Judge clearly favored opposing party.
6. There was never a valid reason to reverse ruling.
A: Since you haven't heard his reasoning, you have no way of saying that. Besides that, your opinion is not the one that counts. His counts. So when you hear the matter and respond to it you can try to sway his opinion.
7. Attorney wanted to keep the issue open for leverage to negotiate the final accounting which I am contesting.
A: I don't know why this is a problem.
8. Small Trust but these guys are affronted that I filed a petition.
A: Let them be offended. Don't sweat it.
9. Big guys make small mistakes but those mistakes are enough to take them down.
A: Ok, I don't get your point.
10. I say Judge cannot change ruling except for good cause or facts justify.
A: Well, you are wrong. A Judge can make decisions because his pancakes were cold that morning or his wife pissed him off. He shouldn't but he can. That's what the appellate process is for. You are quite obviously personally invested with this case which makes you a poor attorney for yourself. Even attorneys have a very hard time representing themselves. Emotion and passion cloud your judgment and strategy. When you add that to not being intimately familiar with the process it's a very bad mix.
You need an attorney my friend. Good luck.
