- Jurisdiction
- California
A rental assistance program that normally requires a 12 month lease gave a client the OK on a voucher for flexibility of lease options, including at minimum month to month. There is an email from a case worker to the client stating this.
Yesterday, the client was approved for a single room occupancy with a month to month lease and was waiting for a deposit to secure the room. Today, that client was told that voucher expired. The client was never told prior of the change nor told it had an expiration.
The client's been homeless, living in her vehicle for over 8 years, seeking help for the whole time, but because she lacks criteria such as drug dependency, mental illness or dependent children, help for her is limited. The client is emotionally devastated.
The question is, does the rental assistance program have any legal obligation to honor the month to month lease voucher?
Yesterday, the client was approved for a single room occupancy with a month to month lease and was waiting for a deposit to secure the room. Today, that client was told that voucher expired. The client was never told prior of the change nor told it had an expiration.
The client's been homeless, living in her vehicle for over 8 years, seeking help for the whole time, but because she lacks criteria such as drug dependency, mental illness or dependent children, help for her is limited. The client is emotionally devastated.
The question is, does the rental assistance program have any legal obligation to honor the month to month lease voucher?