I am involved in a relocation case. MGM has primary custody. Trying to relocate. Claims a whole slew of things - birth mother homeless even though she lived with her until she got housing, MGM claims sole primary care - mother was there with child from birth (Nov. 2008) until Dec. 2009, even though MGM gained custody in Oct. '09. Mother and father saw child frequently from this point until July 2011. 4-7 days per week and freq. overnights, though no visitation order existed. MGM and mother got in fight. MGM threatened TPR. parents filed for primary. Nov. 2011 - parents granted 1 day a wk. visitation. MGM went to TN on business in Dec. 2011. MGM files for emergency relocation to TN April 12. Claims her fiance got job offer from VETERANS ADMIN. No knowledge of this before April 4. Must leave before May 6. April 19th hearing results in conciliation on April 25. At this plaintiff, in desperate attempt, brings up prior TPR of mother and another child. Judge recuses herself and moves it to tpr judge. Sends notice on May 3 of trial on May 22. Defendants file motion for continuance May 6. Scheduled on May 17. Filed pretrial statement May 16. Judge rejected continuance and said trial has been changed to conciliation. Defendants are pro se. Cannot afford counsel. We have proof against claims that we never financially, emotionally, or physically provided for our child. We have two witnesses that we want to call that will offer testimony to emotional connection and frequent visiting prior to July '11. We have video of our son emotionally distraught after two visits. He is three now and says he doesn't want to go home. He wants to go home with mommy and daddy. I don't know what to do. Going into this pro se. Any advice? They want to reduce visiting to 4 or 5 days a year in TN with parents paying expenses and NO overnights. What can we expect in conciliation. Can judge grant it without a trial? Can he do anything without a pysch evaluation of parents, child, MGM? Can I call my witnesses in conciliation or evidence or these videos? Or is this just a way for the judge to get a feel for everything? Also anyone know any attorneys that would do pro bono in Pittsburgh? THANKS.