Has there been any successful defense under California law for a man who has DNA evidence that paternity fruad has been committed? Court action has been brought by the mother to legally order child support. The mother admits that the man is not the father but tells the courts he "assumed the role". He has indeed given money to the woman over the years based upon her lie. She does know who the bio father is.
Also if support is ordered, has Civil rule (60.b) ever been used sucessfully to relieve someone who is a victim of paternity fraud ?
Also if support is ordered, has Civil rule (60.b) ever been used sucessfully to relieve someone who is a victim of paternity fraud ?