While I do not disagree with the legality of AJ's response, I've often wondered why it is considered such a moral or ethical crime for a medical facility to want to be paid for the services they provided.
"CBG", I don't think most of these these medical facilities make much of an effort to collect these debts.
Most write the debt off, or sell it to debt collectors.
If the debt is written off, the facility takes tax break against it.
They also get a couple cents, maybe even a few dimes on every dollar against the debt.
You can't sue a dead person.
Well, you can, but no court has the power to compel or summon the dead to appear.
If they had such a power, how could they enforce it?
The deceased might have an estate.
The estate is the entity that legally owes the debts, not the decedent's family.
But, most people in the country die without much to pass on, except an interest in a home.
I would speculate that the 1%, or even the 10% pays these debts.
The problem is for the 99% or 90% that can't pay their rent, let alone hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt.
One could argue that a parent or spouse might be held liable for a debt.
But, most of the debt collector's go too far and harass, annoy, pester, and harangue extended family members and even friends.
That is a line that shouldn't get crossed.
Society (or at least our legislator's) believe the grieving family should not be pestered during a very difficult time.
I believe this is driven by sound, sympathetic public policy concerns.
Bottom line, no one is required to pay a debt they didn't incur, or have a responsibility to pay.