T
Txdust80
Guest
- Jurisdiction
- US Federal Law
Say a law is on the books. And people have publicly admitted to break said law with zero action taken on them. But suddenly a single person is being charged with said law. Is there any credible defense that since other documented cases in which prosecutors didn't press charges on other individuals and choose to single this one person out give grounds to dismiss the case.
I'm debating the Hilary email scandal. Although I'm not debating one way or another that what she did was right or wrong, but why when the previous two secretary of states plus most of the Bush White House admit to the same offense and we even subpoenas denied in the past because said individuals had used private emails to conduct classified correspondence that by focusing solely on Clinton and not Rice nor Powell or any of the countless Washington big names involved as well strengthens Clintons defense. That even if charges were brought on her, she could have it thrown out based on some sort of discrimination bias. Am I remotely right? Is there a legal term for this?
I'm debating the Hilary email scandal. Although I'm not debating one way or another that what she did was right or wrong, but why when the previous two secretary of states plus most of the Bush White House admit to the same offense and we even subpoenas denied in the past because said individuals had used private emails to conduct classified correspondence that by focusing solely on Clinton and not Rice nor Powell or any of the countless Washington big names involved as well strengthens Clintons defense. That even if charges were brought on her, she could have it thrown out based on some sort of discrimination bias. Am I remotely right? Is there a legal term for this?