B
BLabelle
Guest
- Jurisdiction
- New York
So my parents were outside coming k to the house and someone threw a Heineken bottle next to them. My father said he saw the 2 unknown perps run away. There is a "pizzeria" (I use that word loosely) on my street that is filled with local drunks. Me and my husband suspected it was someone particular we know who tried to target my mother and father so my husband went to the "pizzeria" to search for the person.
My husband was upset and checked the bathroom while slamming the door (it's a light door).
My husband asked the people in the bar, I mean "pizzeria" if they had seen this man. They said had a twisted story, saying they didn't know him but then saying this person moved away 2 years ago (when we saw them 2 months ago). They are obviously lying to protect this hooligan. They ask why he's looking for this man which is none of their business and then...
One big guy calls my husband a bitch. Provoking my husband for no reason and my husband is already stirred up from the situation, so husband spits on the floor (because he knows it illegal to spit on someone) but the spit accidentally lands on the big guys shoe or pant leg.
So then the big guy starts attacking my husband slamming Jim against the wall and punching him and my husband is kicking back in defense. Then my husband said he bit that guys hand to get him off of him. (There were 3 guys to 1) and eventually the fit broke up quickly and the only real injury I see is a few little scars and a swollen arm.
I am just wondering who is in the right? My husband was provoked, he didn't mean to spit on someone and the other guy attacked first.
The big guy claims that my husband was slamming things. He accidentally slammed the bathroom door because it's light, that's no reason to call someone a bitch and provoke them.
What sort of case does this have?
My husband was upset and checked the bathroom while slamming the door (it's a light door).
My husband asked the people in the bar, I mean "pizzeria" if they had seen this man. They said had a twisted story, saying they didn't know him but then saying this person moved away 2 years ago (when we saw them 2 months ago). They are obviously lying to protect this hooligan. They ask why he's looking for this man which is none of their business and then...
One big guy calls my husband a bitch. Provoking my husband for no reason and my husband is already stirred up from the situation, so husband spits on the floor (because he knows it illegal to spit on someone) but the spit accidentally lands on the big guys shoe or pant leg.
So then the big guy starts attacking my husband slamming Jim against the wall and punching him and my husband is kicking back in defense. Then my husband said he bit that guys hand to get him off of him. (There were 3 guys to 1) and eventually the fit broke up quickly and the only real injury I see is a few little scars and a swollen arm.
I am just wondering who is in the right? My husband was provoked, he didn't mean to spit on someone and the other guy attacked first.
The big guy claims that my husband was slamming things. He accidentally slammed the bathroom door because it's light, that's no reason to call someone a bitch and provoke them.
What sort of case does this have?