Injunction against county , etc

Depends on why the Deputy is visiting you.

 

Your frequent use of "etc" doesn't really help explain anything. Exactly what visits are you seeking to prevent? You cannot get an injunction preventing the officer from coming to your home to carry out his/her official duties. So the details count here.

Look, litigating in federal court, especially against the government, is not cheap. The filing fee for the complaint alone is $402. And a well drafted complaint for federal court would take several hours to draft, I don't see many good attorneys who'd be willing to do that for just $200. And the complaint is just the start of the process. There are motions that may need to be filed, there's discovery to do, and perhaps more depending on how the case progresses.

 

Use of "etc." only works when a reader can reasonably infer what it means in the context of the sentence. In this case, that's not possible for either of your uses of "etc." in this sentence. Also visits to whom and for what purpose?

Cool, except that an attorney cannot file an injunction. An attorney can file an application or motion for an injunction, but only a court can file an injunction. Also $200 is such an absurdly low amount of money for something like this as not to be believable.

 

That means he's taking no responsibility for what is filed — the court would assume you prepared the pro se document and if it was screwed up, you'd pay the price.

Good attorneys don't need to brag. Their work speaks for them. Whether he's any good at litigation can't be determined by how fast he responds, but you certainly can infer that he probably doesn't provide great client service if he doesn't respond in a timely manner. Again, you get what you pay for. This guy willing to do a pro se form for you for $200 does not inspire much confidence.

 

That's illogical. Your fine is for the traffic offense you committed. It has nothing to do with the rioters or the city's response. You were found to have violated the law, you pay the penalty for it. No judge will say you are excused from paying it just because you don't like how the city handled the riots. You don't like how the city is run then you vote out the mayor and city council.

 

You disgust me

 

What program? What does it have to do with your traffic fine?

Whatever the program is, what you stated before was that you objected to paying for the fines because of riots and how the city treated the rioters. That has nothing to do with your traffic fine and it is illogical to connect the two.

If you choose not to pay the fine you may later discover that the state will suspend your driver's license. In addition, the longer you delay paying, the more it'll cost you when you finally have to pay. So it's up to you, but the smart move for you, as those attorneys you asked told you, is to pay the fine.

Everyone probably has at least one law they don't like. But they don't get to decide that they can just ignore the laws they don't like without consequence. We live in a democracy — so if the majority favors a law or program you don't like, that's just the way it goes. If we want democracy we have to accept that sometimes the majority is going to come out against us. If you don't understand that then perhaps a civics refresher for you would be helpful.

 

Some exercise their right to "beat feet" or "cut a chogie".
The USA has it's issues, but there are still many excellent places to call home.

 

Were you going to ask her to pay your traffic fine?