Ignorantia juris non excusat is the principle in jurisprudence that one is bound by a law even if one does not know of it. That is in effect prohibition to be ignorant of the law.:no:
We are all presumed to have knowledge of the law.:yes:
The doctrine assumes that the laws have been properly published and distributed.It also assumes it is governmental interest that citizens know and obey the laws.
I wondered why it is not taught in the schools.Child education is compulsory.
Why not provide children approaching maturity with knowledge of that which is demanded from them to know?
I tried to find articles on this question on the web,and I couldn't.
Is there legal obstacle for governments to impose compulsory law education?
If yes,is there legal obstacle for governments to at least offer that as an option?
We are all presumed to have knowledge of the law.:yes:
The doctrine assumes that the laws have been properly published and distributed.It also assumes it is governmental interest that citizens know and obey the laws.
I wondered why it is not taught in the schools.Child education is compulsory.

Why not provide children approaching maturity with knowledge of that which is demanded from them to know?
I tried to find articles on this question on the web,and I couldn't.
Is there legal obstacle for governments to impose compulsory law education?
If yes,is there legal obstacle for governments to at least offer that as an option?
Last edited: