A little background: I let a casual friend borrow a youth-sized .22 caliber firearm and ammunition as my kids are older, and he had sons that he wanted to teach to hunt.
Two years later, he gets arrested for various drug violations after a long undercover operation. My gun and another are seized when they search his house with a warrant. I send a letter to the US District court explaining that I lent him the gun and wanted it back. Months later I get a letter from them which says "United States' Motion to Compel Answers to Complaint", and the District Attorney called me saying he couldn't tell me what to specifically do, but that I needed to answer paragraph by paragraph the original complaint. He also suggested I come to see him, which I said no, it's 1 1/2 hrs away.
The gun is worth maybe $125., and it would cost me much more than that I'm sure to get my lawyer to take care of this. My question is, would you just ignore the letter, and let them take the gun? It gave me the creeps that the DA called my house, I have nothing to do with drugs and don't want to get involved with the case.
Two years later, he gets arrested for various drug violations after a long undercover operation. My gun and another are seized when they search his house with a warrant. I send a letter to the US District court explaining that I lent him the gun and wanted it back. Months later I get a letter from them which says "United States' Motion to Compel Answers to Complaint", and the District Attorney called me saying he couldn't tell me what to specifically do, but that I needed to answer paragraph by paragraph the original complaint. He also suggested I come to see him, which I said no, it's 1 1/2 hrs away.
The gun is worth maybe $125., and it would cost me much more than that I'm sure to get my lawyer to take care of this. My question is, would you just ignore the letter, and let them take the gun? It gave me the creeps that the DA called my house, I have nothing to do with drugs and don't want to get involved with the case.