1ancientfuture1
New Member
The defendent recieved a memorex CD-RW disc containing the security footage; which is not read by defendent's computer. The defendent did briefly view the content of the disc at the prosecuters office; which might signify the defendents computer is not equipped to read such a disc, as none of the 12 or so media players the computer contains were able to read the disc. Also failing in the task are the defendents two distinct DVD players; five or more separate computer systems at the public library; at the high school library; and at the community college aswell. The defendent could continue playing musical chair lotto, trying to find a computer compatible to read the disc the prosecution provided as their evidence against the defendent; or commons sense would indicate to go use the system that was and probably is able to read the disc, in which the prosecutors assistants and the defendent could share a desk for as long as it would take the defense to examine the evidence. This matter is an obvious violation to the rights of evidence (which I do not know about) or I am obvously a moron. But somewhere in between--filing a motion to dismiss the case, and sitting idle awaiting the interpretor that will never arrive--there is sustance to serve the defensive tactics. Question being to this extent, what, if anything, may be done to: terminate proceedings; inadmissable evidence; or too at least have them provide; no scratch that, I do not know the law, but how many opportunities does the defense have when it provided a paper its counterpart was not able to examine within reasonable reasources; and when informed there-of, basically said-that's your problem to figure out. Well, Thank You for your attentiveness.