Failure to Yield to Stationary Emergency Vehicle Citation

Status
Not open for further replies.

islewanderer

New Member
How do you contest and win?

I received a citation under RCW 46.61.212 Failure to Yield to Stationary Emergency Vehicle in April 11am on a Thursday, s/b on I-5, 3+lane hwy. Officer states unmarked Snohomish County Sheriff's vehicle equipped with emergency lights & Siren. On traffic stop with emergency lights & flashing lights DEF didn't merge over to open lane as required by RCW. Officer further states "the lane next to DEF was open & there was no reason for DEF to not move to the empty/open lane. Roadway is 3 lanes NB & SB. emergency vehicle was on the outside shoulder & I was walking outside of my vehicle."

RCW 46.61.212 states that... (ii) On a highway having less than four lanes, proceed with caution, reduce the speed of the vehicle, and, if reasonable, with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, and under the rules of this chapter, yield the right-of-way by passing to the left at a safe distance and simultaneously yield the right-of-way to all vehicles traveling in the proper direction upon the highway; or

(iii) If changing lanes or moving away would be unreasonable or unsafe, proceed with due caution and reduce the speed of the vehicle.

Officer incorrectly listed vehicle as 2007 Ford Econoline E150, which is a full-size regular Ford 1/2 ton van.

Vehicle is actually a commercial 08 Ford LCF 2 ton panel truck. You could almost put a Ford van INSIDE my truck.

The problem I have is that from the right shoulder of the road, there is no way the officer could see what was on the far side of my truck. And, in fact, because I was slowing down as approaching the emergency vehicle, traffic was pulling around and past me in the left lane. There was no way I could move over. And because of the size of my vehicle, the officer could not tell the lane was empty, regardless of what he said.

What is not listed is that it was pissing down rain, and he got splashed by my truck becaue he did not wait for me to pass, before he started walking back to his vehicle, from is traffic stop. Nothing I could do about the rain, or water on the roadway. But there is no way I could move over.

So, how do I fight and win?
 
Appear in court and argue that you slowed to a safe speed as required and did not change lanes becausevut was not safe.
Certainly the officer would have seen other vehicles after you passed and he caught up to you.... so one of you is mistaken.
I suspect that if you passed at a speed and proximity great enough to splash the officer you probably had not sufficiently complied.
 
I thank you for your reply. Standing water on roadway would have splashed even at 30mph. I believe vehicles passed me at a speed that did not put them in the officers view as he was entering his vehicle, and they were long gone by the time he stopped me. If you do not feel sufficiently complied, what would safe speed have been? And would slowing to a crawl not cause additional safety problems for other drivers following me?
 
It will be up to the officer to appear in court and explain why your speed was not safe.
There apparantly was no traffic behind you, so slowing down more may have been an option.
I doubt a judge will buy the argument that the officer could not see or hear the other vehicles on this wet roadway, and they had mysteriously disappeared by the time the officer stopped you. The vehicles would have to be moving significantly slower to be obstructed from view by your vehicle as you suggest.
I'm not saying you are being dishonest.... I'm just saying I think you have a tough argument to make.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top