- Jurisdiction
- Michigan
I was involved in a long series of legal dealings with an ex-girlfriend that ultimately culminated in her falsely accusing me of operating a meth lab in a university. However, I am at fault for possessing a drug that was in a desk at my workspace adjacent that lab, which was used as PC to further proceed in a quarter-million dollar investigation. During that investigation the girl continually leveraged her position as the apparant only witness in that case and her ability to accuse me of anything she wanted, to extort me to do things I did not want, including making a promise to marry her which is evidenced by a tattoo on my ring finger. Since the case I have sustained a great deal of trauma from her coercion, and other fallout resulting from the specific manufacturing false allegation.
My question is, as a defendent in a case where I am not free from fault, but was coerced on the basis of testimony to a crime I did not commit nor was convicted of, do I stand any chance for recourse? Does an extortion charge stand any chance in this sort of case? And if so, how easily could extortion allegations get flipped on me as witness tampering? I have a great deal of evidence to show that I did not initiate these agreements, nor did I want anything to do with them, and only engaged out of fear that she would provide false testimony.
My question is, as a defendent in a case where I am not free from fault, but was coerced on the basis of testimony to a crime I did not commit nor was convicted of, do I stand any chance for recourse? Does an extortion charge stand any chance in this sort of case? And if so, how easily could extortion allegations get flipped on me as witness tampering? I have a great deal of evidence to show that I did not initiate these agreements, nor did I want anything to do with them, and only engaged out of fear that she would provide false testimony.