The law professor had this in a different post:
"Once you dispute the validity of a debt the collection agency is supposed to close the account and send it back to the creditor. By sending them written notice they will be hard pressed to deny that they had received a valid dispute and it should prevent this alleged debt from hitting you where it hurts -- on your credit report."
My questions are:
What constitutes a valid dispute?
You say they should close the account, but what if they don't?
I wrote a different post (I put it in the wrong forum - general criminal law). That post explains how I've come to owe the collection agency/Zieggy's tavern for a check that I wrote out to the electric company.
"Once you dispute the validity of a debt the collection agency is supposed to close the account and send it back to the creditor. By sending them written notice they will be hard pressed to deny that they had received a valid dispute and it should prevent this alleged debt from hitting you where it hurts -- on your credit report."
My questions are:
What constitutes a valid dispute?
You say they should close the account, but what if they don't?
I wrote a different post (I put it in the wrong forum - general criminal law). That post explains how I've come to owe the collection agency/Zieggy's tavern for a check that I wrote out to the electric company.