- Jurisdiction
- Florida
Dear All,
I would need your lights to help understand what can be the risks in my current situation.
Basically, I'm about to buy an apartment and the issue is that the seller has a litigation with his previous property management company and until last week the deal was impossible as there was a lis pendens on the property. However this yesterday the lis pendens has been removed but the litigation remain.
The title company is telling me that they are ok to close only if I sign a hold harmless with them at closing date.
The issue is due to the fact that the litigation is linked to the payment of the apartment as the plaintiff used his own funds to buy the property on behalf of the seller. Therefor it is directly linked to the apartment (even if there is no lis pendens).
What are the solutions ? Should I sign the hold harmless ? Can I add something in the contract preventing the plaintiff to ask for the property after the sale ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Maxime.
I would need your lights to help understand what can be the risks in my current situation.
Basically, I'm about to buy an apartment and the issue is that the seller has a litigation with his previous property management company and until last week the deal was impossible as there was a lis pendens on the property. However this yesterday the lis pendens has been removed but the litigation remain.
The title company is telling me that they are ok to close only if I sign a hold harmless with them at closing date.
The issue is due to the fact that the litigation is linked to the payment of the apartment as the plaintiff used his own funds to buy the property on behalf of the seller. Therefor it is directly linked to the apartment (even if there is no lis pendens).
What are the solutions ? Should I sign the hold harmless ? Can I add something in the contract preventing the plaintiff to ask for the property after the sale ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Maxime.