Child Support For Non-Parent

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desiree

New Member
Tonite, my boyfriend told me he received a letter from the State of Kansas saying that the state was going to increase his child support payments. I was not aware that he was making child support statements, nor that he had a child...

Here is the story as he relayed it to me.

Fifteen years ago a girl he had sex with twice got pregnant. He learned shortly thereafter that she was in a sexual relationship with three other people around the same time. She told the state that my boyfriend, Stephen, was the father. At the time a blood test was done that, according to the state, confirmed his paternity. At the time of the blood test he asked the child services representative about a DNA test but was ignored. He was told that he was the father and that there was nothing he could do about it but that he must start paying child support. He may or may not have signed something (he can't remember) but if he did he believes at the time he was told he had no choice. His father called the child support agency regarding proving paternity and was threatened to 'drop it'.

My boyfriend has been paying child support since the child was born (15 years). He was never in a relationship with this woman (she was dating somebody else when he had sex with her) and he never tried to marry her. He has never seen the child. The mother has told other people that the child was not his.

Because he was told he had no choice but to pay the support and was told by child services that he could not see the child, he has not pursued it until now.

He has paid around 50,000 $ in child support. He plans on requesting a DNA test. My questions are these - if the child is not his, will he have to continue paying child support? Is he entitled to be reimbursed for the child support he paid? If so would it be the responsibility of the state or the responsibility of the mother? If the child is his can he request a meeting with the child?
 
Last edited:
Yes your boyfriend can file for visitation at anytime. Personally I have no idea why he didn't file before now. He has EVERY right to pursue a relationship with his child. He can certainly request a DNA test to re-confirm but it probably does not matter this late in the game. He really never did anything about this it sounds like. He could have filed a paternity action in court long before now. If the state is filing for an increase in CS then it sounds like mom has gone on public assistance.
 
To me, it sounds like she randomly picked one of the four guys she was sleeping with and the state told Stephen that he's daddy and his blood type matched so nothing can be done.

I guess what I didn't make clear is it is probable the child isn't his. The girl has said it's not his, her relatives have told his relatives that it looks like another boy she was boinking.

After asking if he could visit when the child 5 years later (10 years ago) child services said he could not visit the child. When you're told you have no choice by the people in control I guess you just give up trying.

I'm still looking for some answers on this - I don't understand how if the child is probably not his, and a DNA test will confirm it, that he still has to pay child support.

And by the way, I wouldn't go around advocating visitation after 15 years of absence with a sketchy paternity test without suggesting some sort of proof. "This is your father according to the state of Kansas." Yeah, right, I'm sure the kid needs that. If its not his kid all he's done for him is pay child support because he was made to. That's the basis to a long-lasting relationship right there. Instead of visitation I think you mean 'check on investment'.
 
Last edited:
If he is going to pay so much for a child, regardless if the child is not his or not, hemight as well meet the child and get to know him. that is my take. And regardless of what the DNA test says, if he is the legal father, he is the father. If you just found out about this child last night chances are you know very little about the whole situation. This is Dad's issue, he needs to deal with it. He should see an attorney to find out how paternity was originally established but because he has waited so long to legally dispute this, he is probably out of luck. You have no idea if he is the father or not. He could be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Question

Back
Top