Hello
  1. Free Legal Help, Legal Forms and Lawyers. TheLaw.com has been providing free legal assistance online since 1995. Our most popular destinations for legal help are below. It only takes a minute to join our legal community!

    Dismiss Notice

Can I file for contempt of court for a violation of a ruling no longer active?

Discussion in 'Civil Court, Procedure & Litigation' started by Kaun, Feb 9, 2018.

  1. Kaun

    Kaun Law Topic Starter New Member

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Jurisdiction:
    Washington
    Hi. Washington state.

    My ex wife got a court order limiting me to supervised visits with my child. She refused to let me see the child although the court allowed it. Meanwhile, there is a different ruling in place.

    My general question is: Can one file a motion for contempt of court for a ruling no longer active?

    I guess I could not ask in court for the other party to be ordered to comply with the no longer valid ruling. But could I ask that they be held in contempt and be punished or ask for compensation.

    Is that possible or are contempt of court motions only valid for active rulings?

    Thank you
     
  2. mightymoose

    mightymoose Moderator

    Messages:
    11,478
    Likes Received:
    2,026
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Your question is a bit confusing, but it seems you want the court to take some punitive action over something you already know is no longer in effect.
    An order that has expired can not be enforced as the people the order had applied to are no longer bound by it.
     
  3. army judge

    army judge Super Moderator

    Messages:
    35,275
    Likes Received:
    6,185
    Trophy Points:
    113


    You need to hire a lawyer in order to create a visitation order.

    Talk to a lawyer, he or she will discuss specifics with you and COSTS.

    Good luck...
     
  4. cbg

    cbg Super Moderator

    Messages:
    8,888
    Likes Received:
    2,114
    Trophy Points:
    113

    If a ruling is not in effect, then no one is required to follow it. If no one is required to follow it, then they cannot be held in contempt for not doing so. That's just common sense.
     
  5. Kaun

    Kaun Law Topic Starter New Member

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    I understand. I just thought that because they violated the order in the past I had some sort of recourse. Thank you
     
  6. zddoodah

    zddoodah Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,813
    Likes Received:
    1,808
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Huh?

    Depends on the relevant facts and circumstances, which are anything but clear based on what you posted.

    You can ask for anything you like, but I doubt that's really what you wanted to ask.

    If the court entered Order #1 on January 1, 2017 and, on July 1, 2017, Susan violated that order, the possibility exists that she may be held in contempt. That the court entered Order #2 on August 1, 2017 doesn't change that fact.
     

Share This Page