The arguments and the evidence are very persuasive, I provided detailed references to the perjury that was committed, as well as other instances of perjury that could be verified by specific individuals, and included all documents, (motion, depositions, and a private investigator report). The main issue for me is that the person in the certificate of service of the motion, is a prominent person in a regional school district administration, and the police and district attorney are in the same town. The perjury directly implicates this person as he was a party to and was aware of the elements of perjury and he approved the motion to be filed with the court. I believe that this has had an impact on the police and the DA, although they are claiming that they have never heard of anyone being criminally charged with perjury, and I am still waiting for them to say they won't investigate it. But, I believe that message is coming soon.