Search results

Are you saying that he's on the SSA paperwork as your guardian? Meaning he gets your check?

I completely agree. Texas is perhaps the most debtor-friendly state in the country. OP, you need to know this. If they start threatening you, there may be another avenue you can explore ... in other words, there might be a cause of action (you suing THEM) they might not like.

Doing a quick scan regarding PIPs tells me that you can't win here no matter what you do. If you agree, they've got a decent cover-their-backside if you get fired. If you don't agree, they can fire you anyway. What I don't think you should do is leave voluntarily. I'm also operating...

Look at the contract. We can't see it. If he gave an estimate, the law is generally on his side - estimates are just that. Estimates. But this one is going to depend on what the contract said.

Their terms and conditions address refunds SEVERAL TIMES. I believe you're tilting and windmills. (How come I can find them and you can't?)

You should, yes. Does your contract say anything specifically?

Let's start here. At first glance it does actually appear that you don't fit the exemptions...but it doesn't appear to be crystal clear. You can read this: http://www.tyla.org/tyla/assets/File/Truancy%20Pamphlet%202012.pdf http://www.schoollawsection.org/attendance.html Read this, too...

Oh good heavens! Ignore them. Completely. Don't answer their texts, or calls.

Fargo would also be a decent option. Except for the weather. -35 in the winter, and in the high 90s in the summer. Fargo has 2 weeks of decent weather: May-ish and October-ish. That's it. Trust me on that one. Walking to and from the cardiac IC unit with frozen eyelashes.

I'd also find out if you were served by other means - it's not necessary for someone to walk up to you and hand you the paperwork.

First and only warning. Be polite. Thanks.

You need an attorney. For what it's worth, most people would not take a letter as you describe seriously - for several reasons, but the obvious one is that a psychiatrist is simply not going to provide such a letter outside of a subpoena.

That would be up to the licensing folk.

The LP still has to follow the rules. In this case, http://www.lpdirect.net/casb/crs/16-3-201.html

(I actually did understand that, AJ :D )

AJ - I've just lit a candle for you. Just because we may not agree from time to time (ahem :D ), doesn't mean I can't send you my bestest of best wishes.

Nope, didn't understand a thing. Try again?

If we can refrain from calling posters rapists when there has been no rape conviction that'd be great.

This truly is one that's outside the realm of legal information and slap bang in the middle of "It's your decision" territory. I didn't check your post hx yet...so this is what I have right now. They've lived elsewhere for 4 YEARS? A court may find it unreasonable to remove them without...

Once again, the letter means absolutely nothing. Child services won't pay any attention to it. What's more important though isn't who the child is with, but that the child is safe. It appears that the child IS safe.