I am a grad student filing a suit against my former professor, to recover travel expenses he offered to pay for a conference he mandated I go to. I have taken a couple legal studies courses, this is to ask for comments anyone might have.
The professor required a group of about 8 grad students to go to a conference, provided them with RT airline tickets and hotel rooms, for educational purposes only. 3 months later the professor dictated I leave the university on involuntary LOA for health reasons. 5 months after that I turned in the expense report with receipts (airport parking, meals, etc.) for $245 (for 5 days). The other students had been reimbursed shortly after the trip but I did not file a report promptly due to a chronic illness, since at that time there was no time limit for submitting it.
Apparently (I can only guess) some months after I left on LOA he declared a new rule that expense reports must be turned in within X number of days or they would not be honored. He never informed me of this.
Since he refuses to reimburse me because of a rule that he made some months after I left, and never told me about, I think I have a good case for my small claims suit. Are there any relevant principles I need to be aware of?
The professor required a group of about 8 grad students to go to a conference, provided them with RT airline tickets and hotel rooms, for educational purposes only. 3 months later the professor dictated I leave the university on involuntary LOA for health reasons. 5 months after that I turned in the expense report with receipts (airport parking, meals, etc.) for $245 (for 5 days). The other students had been reimbursed shortly after the trip but I did not file a report promptly due to a chronic illness, since at that time there was no time limit for submitting it.
Apparently (I can only guess) some months after I left on LOA he declared a new rule that expense reports must be turned in within X number of days or they would not be honored. He never informed me of this.
Since he refuses to reimburse me because of a rule that he made some months after I left, and never told me about, I think I have a good case for my small claims suit. Are there any relevant principles I need to be aware of?
